Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vermillion County Council tables $100,000 appropriation for countywide economic development services with RISE
Summary
Councilmembers tabled a proposed $100,000 payment to RISE (Arise) to fund an economic development director and administrative assistant after questions about contract language, oversight, and RISE governance; commissioners said they are open to contract edits and the request may return to the council.
The Vermillion County Council voted to table a $100,000 additional appropriation request to fund a countywide economic development services agreement with RISE (also referred to as Arise in meeting materials).
The agreement, drafted by county officials and consultant John Myers, would allocate $100,000 from the county's economic development fund to the RISE entity to support a director and an administrative assistant focused on economic development for the entire county. "We need boots on the ground, somebody to answer the phone calls, somebody to take people out and drive them around," said John Myers, who identified himself as a retired attorney and consultant with prior experience in county economic development.
Councilmembers raised questions about contract language, hiring oversight and the job duties expected of employees funded by the county. Councilmember Furry moved to table the appropriation; Councilmember Costello seconded. After discussion about drafting clarifications and exchanging redlines, the motion to table carried on a voice vote.
What was proposed: Presenters described the arrangement as county funds paid to RISE, with RISE hiring and supervising the employee(s). The county's $100,000 contribution was presented as a partial share of a larger compensation package the RISE expects to assemble for a director and assistant; presenters said the arrangement could represent cost savings compared with prior direct-county staffing of similar functions. The agreement as circulated referenced semiannual payments and included a simple two-page contract; presenters and councilmembers discussed modifying language to clarify that the positions are full time and that the county's economic-development needs (including redevelopment matters) be included in job duties.
Governance and statutory references: Speakers noted that the RISE entity is governed by a five-member board appointed by the county commissioners and that a state statute (36-7-30) governs appointment and terms for that entity. Presenters said commissioners were willing to accept contract edits requested by the council and suggested returning an amended agreement for approval.
Related concerns raised at the meeting included a RISE water-rate issue and the RISE's current tenant mix: a RISE representative said jail water usage and recent rate increases had materially affected the RISE's water costs and that the jail is the RISE's largest water tenant. Councilmembers asked for clearer contract language specifying that the economic development position would serve the whole county (including redevelopment) and for written job descriptions and hiring processes.
Next steps: Commissioners and RISE representatives encouraged the council to provide redline suggestions and specific wording changes; presenters said the board would consider edits and return the agreement for a future meeting. Councilmembers suggested the contribution could be phased (for example, funding $50,000 now with further funding in next year's budget) and that final funding might wait until the RISE posts the job and demonstrates hiring plans.
