Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consent Calendar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves consent items including laptops, CTE partnerships, MOUs; CSEA item pulled for later
Summary
The Monrovia Unified School District board approved multiple consent items at its August meetings, including the purchase of 120 HP laptops for the Monrovia Community Adult School, CTE partnerships, a City of Hope internship affiliation and a resolution committing 2025–26 general fund balances.
Get email alerts on the Consent Calendar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Monrovia Unified School District board approved several consent and action items during the August meetings, including equipment purchases, interagency agreements, personnel job descriptions and fund commitments.
Key approved items reported in the meetings included: - Purchase of 120 HP laptops for the Monrovia Community Adult School, selected to provide Microsoft-based training rather than Chromebooks. - A sub-agreement with Pasadena Area Community College District to improve career-technical education (CTE) programs. - A facility-use agreement with the YMCA to provide pool access for teams (reported under facilities coverage). - An affiliation agreement with City of Hope to provide internships for the medical assisting program. - Adoption of a resolution committing general fund balances for the 2025–26 fiscal year. - Acceptance of a notice of completion for a roofing project and authorization of a $40,042 refund/return to the contractor (MMC). - Approval of new or retitled job descriptions, including a CTE specialist and a district health service supervisor (retitled district health coordinator). - Ratification of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Monrovia Teachers Association (MTA) regarding employee benefits.
One item was pulled from the consent calendar for later consideration: the MOU with the California School Employees Association (CSEA) was removed from the consent agenda and expected to be considered at a later meeting. The meeting record did not include detailed vote tallies or mover/second names for these approvals; items on the consent calendar were described in the transcript as having passed.

