Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Accessory Structure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board OKs accessory structure before principal residence at Lytle Creek Road with conditions

5760698 · September 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Rutherford County BZA granted a special exception allowing a 3,200-square-foot storage building to remain while the owner constructs a principal residence within two years, subject to noncommercial-use conditions and compliance with setbacks.

The Rutherford County Board of Zoning Appeals approved a special exception for an accessory structure that was built before a principal residence on property at 4750 Lytle Creek Road.

Planning staff said the 12.2-acre RM-zoned site contains an unpermitted 40-by-80-foot (3,200-square-foot) metal storage building erected by the property owner and is the subject of code-enforcement action. The applicant told the board the structure will be used to store building supplies and personal items while the primary residence is constructed; the applicant stated plans to build the principal dwelling within two years.

Staff recommended approval with conditions consistent with the county’s rules for a noncommercial accessory structure: only one such noncommercial storage facility is permitted per property; the structure must meet allowable square footage and setback requirements; it may not be used for living quarters; it may not host commercial activities or store materials from off-site commercial businesses, including home-based businesses.

Clyde Brownfield, of Ellison Steel Engineering, said he was representing the property owner and that the construction of the storage building was a misunderstanding of sequence, and that the owner plans to build the house within two years. No public opposition was raised during the hearing.

A board motion to approve the special exception, with the recommended conditions, passed unanimously in roll call (Yes: Mike Curtis; Jerry Sartain; Renee Curtis; Patrick Hale; Zane Cantrell). The staff recommendation and conditions will govern the property and the approval is recorded as a special exception to be complied with by the owner.