Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthcare Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge county and health district to preserve Cleveland Clinic maternity services
Summary
During public comment at the Sebastian City Council meeting, residents urged officials to oppose closure of the Cleveland Clinic hospital’s maternity ward, saying loss would harm maternal and infant outcomes and local housing attractiveness.
Residents used the council’s public‑input portion of the meeting to urge public officials and the hospital district to oppose a possible closure of the maternity ward at Cleveland Clinic Hospital in Indian River County.
Deborah Schellenberger, who identified herself as a long‑time local resident with 45 years of experience in health care, urged officials to pressure decision‑makers to keep the local maternity unit open. Schellenberger told council the hospital’s neonatal death rate in the county is substantially lower than national averages and warned that if the local ward closed and patients were directed to hospitals 45 minutes away, outcomes for mothers and babies could worsen because “when something goes wrong, it goes wrong very fast.”
Why it matters: Several speakers said Cleveland Clinic is the county’s only local maternity provider and that losing the ward would reduce access to time‑sensitive obstetric care, potentially increasing risk for mothers and infants and discouraging young families from moving to the area.
Other details from public comment: Schellenberger said the Fletcher region’s neonatal death rate is lower than national averages (she cited local figures of 0.8 compared with national averages in the 3.5 range) and warned that closing a local ward can set off a chain reaction of service losses at hospitals. A second speaker, who noted she serves on the fetal infant mortality review, said other nearby hospitals have closed maternity units in recent years and that the county hospital district has been “picking up the slack.”
Council response and next steps: Council did not take formal action on the matter during this meeting; staff and council members acknowledged the public comments and indicated the issue involves the hospital district and county agencies rather than municipal authority. Several council members agreed public advocacy may be warranted.
Ending: The comments put council on notice of community concern about access to local maternal care; the council did not vote on hospital matters but may consider coordination or letters supporting local maternity services in coming weeks.
