Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landmark Center Demolition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Powhatan board reviews Dewberry report, weighs options if Landmark Center demolition permit is denied
Summary
Powhatan County School Board heard a facilities presentation and Dewberry study estimating renovation and demolition costs for the Landmark Center complex, discussed asbestos and mold concerns, and debated contingency plans if the county denies a demolition permit.
Powhatan County School Board members reviewed a Dewberry facilities assessment of the Landmark Center and discussed next steps if the board of supervisors does not grant a demolition permit.
The Dewberry study and a facilities presentation by Tom Solser and Bob Benway described structural deterioration, mold and suspected asbestos and outlined cost estimates for targeted repairs and larger renovation work. Board members said the board must have a strategy in case the county refuses a demolition permit and removes the option to raze the building.
Board member speakers emphasized the building's age and historic overlay status while describing sections of the complex as “in dire straits.” One board member summarized the central practical question: “If the board of supervisors does not grant the demolition permit, what our next step and strategy should be,” and urged the board to be ready with alternatives ranging from roof repairs to transferring responsibility to the supervisors.
Solser and Benway showed photos of long-term deterioration and told the board that Dewberry’s December estimate for kitchen, dining and related work totaled roughly $535,000 but warned that asbestos and mold remediation could push costs much higher. One board member said they had seen Dewberry material suggesting renovation could cost about as much as demolition, and another noted the capital improvement plan (CIP) set aside approximately $900,000 for demolition.
Board members repeatedly raised staff and visitor safety concerns tied to mold and mildew and said those health and safety issues were driving urgency on planning. The discussion also referenced uncertainty about where substantial renovation funding would come from if the county declined demolition; one member suggested asking supervisors to take demolition funds and instead place a roof on the building and assume remediation responsibility.
No formal board action was taken on a demolition request at the meeting. Board members asked staff to prepare strategy options, noting the decision is partly contingent on the county board of supervisors and on further technical information about asbestos and mold.
The presentation and discussion occurred during the facilities and PLC demolition item of the Sept. 9 meeting; the board did not adopt a motion to demolish at this session.
