Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pmdp Hunt Club topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council defers decision on amended master plan for 1520 Hunt Club Boulevard

5744774 · September 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Gallatin Council Committee voted unanimously on Sept. 9 to defer consideration of an amended preliminary master development plan for a roughly 1-acre parcel at 1520 Hunt Club Boulevard. The applicant was not present; planning staff said the proposal would allow 14 live-work units on land zoned MU.

The City of Gallatin Council Committee on Sept. 9 unanimously voted to defer consideration of ordinance 02509-47, an amended preliminary master development plan (PMDP) for 1520 Hunt Club Boulevard, until a future work session.

Brian Rose, the city planner, told the committee the subject parcel is approximately 1 acre, south of Nashville Pike and west of Hunt Club Boulevard, currently zoned MU (mixed use). The applicant proposes 14 live-work units; the MU district allows up to 15 dwelling units per acre. Rose said the plan would provide two-car garages and 10 additional rear parking spaces and that the planning commission had classified the submission as a major amendment and recommended approval by a 7–0 vote.

Rose and committee members said the project's representative, Josh King, was not present that evening. Vice Mayor Hayes moved to defer the item "to the next work session"; Councilman Vann seconded the motion. The motion passed by voice vote with no recorded opposition. No substantive change to the PMDP was adopted at the Sept. 9 meeting.

The planner described the proposed commercial component as flexible and not yet fully specified; possible business uses the applicant listed included business and communication services, financial and consulting services, administrative services and medical services. Rose said the plan "does not determine what the associated nonresidential uses would be, specifically," and that the most likely case would be small-office uses.

Because the applicant was not present, councilmembers deferred their substantive questions to the next meeting. Planning-commission materials in the council packet include earlier approvals for the broader Hunt Club development and conceptual elevations submitted by the applicant.