Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Goals And Workshop Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews draft district goals, schedules assessment and special-education briefings; schedules AI discussion
Summary
The Arlington board discussed draft district goals including a five-year target of 80% proficiency in K–8 ELA and math, scheduled presentations on state assessment results and special education programming, and agreed to place artificial intelligence usage on a future agenda for clarification of guidelines.
The Arlington Central School District board reviewed a draft set of district goals for the school year and discussed a calendar of board workshop topics and reports.
Superintendent (Dr.) Benante outlined five draft goals, including a five-year target of 80% proficiency in English language arts and mathematics for grades K–8. “Our first goal is related to student achievement, and establishing a 5 year target of 80% proficiency in ELA and mathematics in grades k through 8,” the superintendent said. The board discussed how progress would be measured, with members noting the district uses local assessments (iReady was named as an example) and that state assessment results typically arrive later and are presented in September.
The board scheduled a number of near-term presentations and check-ins: Mr. Orcutt will present New York State assessment results at the committee-of-the-whole meeting on Sept. 16; Tetra Tech and Palumbo are slated to present capital-project updates with an event already scheduled for Oct. 21 and additional sessions to be set; a special-education and pupil-personnel programming report from Dr. Kachen will be presented at a committee-of-the-whole meeting on Dec. 16; and a food-insecurity follow-up with Mark Hicks, director of food services, is scheduled for Sept. 30.
Board members raised concerns about goal specificity and monitoring. One member urged that the five-year goal be accompanied by annual benchmarks so progress is visible: “What I'll appreciate seeing over the next 5 years is seeing how schools, what their target is for that year within those 5 years and how we're progressing as we go,” a member said. The superintendent suggested using the usual midyear review in December to provide an update tied to the district goals and annual local-assessment reporting.
Separately, Board Member Sofia Bonet Hollis requested a future discussion item on artificial intelligence: “I would like to bring a future discussion item about artificial intelligence… I just want to understand what if we're doing any and if we are not, if there is a short term plan, long term plan,” she said. The board agreed to place the topic on the agenda for the next public meeting; staff were directed to coordinate with the board member and the superintendent to scope the discussion.
Board members also discussed family engagement and the breadth of the fifth draft goal (academic, social and emotional supports), with multiple members urging clearer language or breaking broad goals into more specific items. The superintendent said principals will prioritize which schools address family engagement or intervention work first and that the board will receive updates at midyear and during the usual annual reporting cycle.
