Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning And Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crowley zoning committee denies conditional‑use request after residents object to commercial operations in single‑family area
Summary
The Crowley zoning committee accepted the planning commission’s recommendation and denied a conditional‑use request by Brandon Romero to move an office and use yard space near East First Street after neighbor testimony raised concerns about traffic, noise and the impact on the historic single‑family neighborhood.
The Crowley Zoning and Annexation Committee voted on Sept. 9 to accept the Crowley Planning Commission’s recommendation and deny a conditional‑use request by Brandon Romero to relocate an office and use yard space near 718–715 East First Street in an R‑1/R‑3 transition area.
Chair Alderman Reggie moved to accept the planning commission’s unfavorable recommendation and the motion carried in committee, with what the clerk recorded as four votes in favor of denial and one opposing vote. “Any opposed? Mr. Martin opposes,” the clerk recorded, and the committee chair announced the tally: “We have 4 yeses and 1 no, so we will deny the conditional use permit.”
Romero, who has operated from the property since 1978 and described recent cleanup and maintenance to council members, asked the committee to permit an office across the street and parking for company vehicles. He told the committee he would not use the yard to store wrecked cars. “We’re applying to possibly move our office across the street, remodel the house that is there, and move our office there and use the yard pretty much for parking for our office staff, customers that come,” Romero said.
Dozens of neighbors and interested residents spoke during a public‑hearing‑style presentation at the committee. Speakers who opposed the request said the property sits inside or adjacent to long‑established single‑family fabric and historic neighborhoods and that commercial activity, tow‑truck operations and frequent heavy‑vehicle traffic would harm property values and public safety.
Sharon Core, a long‑time resident and vice chairman of the Crowley Historic District Commission, told the committee the location is within an R‑1 single‑family residential district and said the proposed use conflicts with the ordinance. “The proposed use does not align with this ordinance and should not be pursued through a variance, a conditional use, or a zoning change,” Core said. Several other residents cited traffic, noise from wreckers and the risk that permitting a business use would set a precedent for additional commercial operations in the neighborhood.
Other speakers urged the council to approve Romero’s request with conditions rather than deny it outright, noting that a conditional use permit allows the committee to impose restrictions. City resident and speaker Tony Crater argued a conditional‑use approval would let the council place binding stipulations; “If you vote yes, you get to put rules,” he said.
Committee members discussed whether the parcel is properly zoned for the requested use, whether the structure meets building‑code occupancy requirements and whether the planning and code enforcement staff had inspected utilities and setbacks. Planning and zoning staff said the applicant’s request had been reviewed by the Crowley Planning Commission, which recommended denial and sent the matter back to the council for final action. The committee also reviewed images and a timeline of the property’s use submitted by the applicant.
A separate conditional‑use matter on the same agenda — an application by Heather Kelly for permission to occupy an accessory building at 719 Huval Street as a residence — was tabled after staff advised that the property lacks a certificate of occupancy and that the certified building official (CBO) should review the structure for habitability and code compliance. The committee voted to table that request for further review.
What’s next: Zoning committee members noted that the committee’s vote is a recommendation to the full council; the full council will take a final vote at the next regular meeting. Staff said the Kelly matter will return after the CBO inspects the accessory structure and reports on utilities, setbacks and plan compliance.
Ending: The committee’s denial preserves the current single‑family zoning restrictions for the parcel pending the full council’s final action. The record shows a contested mix of long‑time residents seeking neighborhood preservation and a property owner seeking a regulated commercial use with stated conditions.
