Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Social Emotional Learning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and residents urge board to adopt Wayfinder social-emotional curriculum
Summary
Public commenters urged the board to adopt Wayfinder SEL curriculum for high schools, citing its role in building life skills, belonging and suicide-prevention supports.
Get email alerts on the Social Emotional Learning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several members of the public urged the Battle Ground School District board to adopt the Wayfinder social-emotional learning (SEL) curriculum for high schools, saying the program builds skills that reduce student isolation and support mental health.
Sabrina Worthy, a local resident and former social worker, told the board that SEL is “not an add-on” but the foundation of safe, supportive school environments. She recommended the district adopt Wayfinder, saying it teaches stress management, conflict resolution and the relational skills that help students reach out for help and reduce risk of violence or suicide.
Kristen Wade, speaking on behalf of Clark County’s Developmental Disabilities Advisory Board, invited the board and community to a county event and noted that many nominees and awardees at the event are former district students; her remarks were an informational item but included broad support for inclusive supports that help students succeed.
Jessica Cole, a resident and parent, told the board she supports Wayfinder and said students on the committee — including student representative Itzel Contreras Montiel, who participated in curriculum review — strongly endorsed adoption. Cole said the curriculum is research-based, flexible and timely, and she warned that delay would force the curriculum committee to restart work and waste time students need now. She cited student suicides in the community and argued the program’s skills are an immediate need.
Board members listened but did not take a policy vote during the meeting. The public-comment period was staffed to allow three minutes per speaker. Directors thanked speakers and reserved further discussion for committee and board review.
