Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Volunteer Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Punxsutawney Area SD board weighs volunteer clearance rules; seeks FAQ and policy clarification
Summary
Board members debated differences between positional volunteers (coaches) and guest volunteers (PTO helpers), tuberculosis testing requirements and fingerprinting; the board asked administration to prepare a clear FAQ and consider policy language updates.
Get email alerts on the Volunteer Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members at the Punxsutawney Area SD meeting asked administrators to clarify which volunteers need which criminal‑history and child‑abuse clearances, and whether guest volunteers (for example, PTO parents who chaperone a daytime field trip or help at a classroom party) should be required to provide the same clearances now commonly required of volunteer coaches.
Administrators outlined two categories used in district policy: "position volunteers" (for example, volunteer coaches and certain chaperones who are effectively in a sustained role) and "guest volunteers" (PTO helpers, guest speakers and short‑term volunteers). The district’s solicitor and staff advised that state code requires tuberculosis testing for volunteers except where the statute permits an exemption for volunteers who are with children fewer than 10 hours per week; the administration clarified the threshold is 10 hours per week (not 10 hours total). One administrator summarized the practice: guest volunteers normally complete two of three clearances; positional volunteers typically complete all three, including fingerprint‑based checks.
Why it matters: members of the public had raised concerns about perceived inconsistencies after social media questions and requests for guidance. Board members said parents seek a simple answer: what clearances are needed for different volunteer activities and when a volunteer may be left alone with students.
Board direction and next steps: the board asked administration to draft a plain‑language FAQ that lists required clearances by volunteer type and typical activities (classroom party, one‑day field trip, overnight trip, volunteer coach) and to bring suggested policy wording to the next board meeting. A board member proposed that policy language be clarified to explicitly state that guest volunteers shall not be left alone with students unless they meet the positional volunteer clearances; the administration agreed to review the policy text with the solicitor and PSBA guidance.
Clarifications from staff included: state criminal‑history and child‑abuse clearances are separate checks (different databases may return different results); volunteers under age 18 generally are not required to obtain the same clearances because the databases typically do not return records for minors; and fingerprinting and FBI checks may be required for positional volunteers because those roles sometimes convert to paid positions or involve overnight travel. The board requested that the FAQ be reviewed with the solicitor and PSBA resources before public distribution.
Ending: The board did not change policy at the meeting but directed staff to prepare specific guidance, and to place any necessary policy amendments on a future agenda after review with legal counsel and PSBA resources.

