Votes at a glance: Madison County Board approves agenda, capital plan, lighting change order, contracts and personnel items

5734298 · September 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Sept. 5 special session the board approved the agenda, a revised capital plan, an LED lighting change order, multiple contracts, personnel items and supplementary contracts; all motions passed by voice vote.

The Madison County Board of Education took multiple formal actions during the Sept. 5 special session. Board members voted by voice on all items listed below; minutes recorded “Aye — motion carries” and no recorded roll-call tallies for individual members.

• Approval of the Sept. 5 agenda — Motion by Mister Jones; second by Mister Vest. Outcome: approved (voice vote).

• Adoption of the revised 2026–2030 Madison County School System Capital Plan — Motion by Mister Vest; second by Mister Jones. Board clarified “revised” meant additions since the preview; outcome: approved (voice vote).

• Change order for Spartan Middle School (SMS) softball field LED lighting project — Motion by Mister Jones; second by Mister Vest. Staff said the change order came in under budget for $7,500 in change-order items; outcome: approved (voice vote).

• Approval of contracts for services (unspecified in meeting packet) — Motion by Mister Vest; second by Mister Jones. Outcome: approved (voice vote).

• Approval of personnel items (unspecified) — Motion by Mister Vest; second by Mister Jones. Outcome: approved (voice vote).

• Approval of team contracts — Motion by Mister Jones; second by Mister Byrd. Outcome: approved (voice vote).

• Approval of supplemental contracts — Motion by Mister Jones; second by Mister Vest. Outcome: approved (voice vote).

The board adjourned after approving these items and announced its next regular meeting for Sept. 11 at 5:30 p.m. at Walnut Grove. The district did not record individual yes/no votes in the public transcript; minutes show each motion carried on a voice “Aye.”