Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Patricio County consultant outlines classification and pay-study covering about 475 employees
Summary
Management Advisory Group presented a countywide employee classification and compensation study plan to San Patricio County Commissioners Court, describing methods, timeline and deliverables and responding to questions about past studies and implementability.
San Patricio County commissioners heard a presentation from Management Advisory Group on a countywide employee classification and compensation study that will review roughly 475 employees and about 125 unique job titles.
The study, Management Advisory Group consultant Steve Foster said, will gather information from employees and supervisors by electronic questionnaire, review and update existing job descriptions, perform a market survey of comparable local and state employers and propose a new compensation plan the county can afford to implement.
The study matters because its recommendations will form the basis for any future pay adjustments, position reclassifications and budgeting decisions that affect county recruitment and retention. Foster said the firm will deliver a draft report to human resources, then refine department-level sections with department heads before producing a final report for the commissioners.
Foster described the study process and timeline: employee data already provided by human resources; current step is employee sessions and questionnaire rollout; market comparisons will use a list of 15 peer organizations that the consultant described as eight counties, three municipalities and four independent school districts. Foster said the firm expects to produce a draft report in November and complete follow-up and final deliverables after the new year, and that the county will receive a maintenance tool to allow the county to update results between formal studies.
Foster said the firm will not be evaluating individual employees’ performance and will not recommend salary decreases; he warned staff and commissioners that the study cannot guarantee salary increases. “We cannot guarantee a salary increase as a result of this study,” Foster said. “Any shortfalls we find along the way are going to be highlighted in our detailed report so that when decisions are made, we will be well informed.” He also said, “We never recommend salary decreases as part of our studies.”
A commissioner raised concerns that a previous study produced a compensation plan that did not align with job duties or practical implementation, and asked the consultants to ensure the final product is usable for elected officials, department heads and staff. Foster responded that the questionnaire and in-person engagement are intended to reduce such disconnects by collecting current information directly from incumbents and supervisors.
Details the court recorded include the consultant’s summary that the market survey will compare county jobs to local competitors in driving distance and to similarly sized employers outside commuting range; the consultant said the team will group similar jobs, rank the roughly 125 titles for internal equity, and produce both organization-level and per-position cost estimates. Foster said the firm will provide implementation cost estimates and an administrative tool for ongoing maintenance of the pay plan.
The presentation was informational; no formal action or vote on the study was recorded at the meeting.
