Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sage Hills Phase 2 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves Sage Hills Phase 2 preliminary plat; allows flag‑lot access
Summary
The North Logan Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat and subdivision improvement plan for Sage Hills Phase 2, including the use of a flag lot to provide access to a constrained buildable area, subject to staff‑recommended conditions.
The North Logan Planning Commission at its meeting approved the Sage Hills Phase 2 preliminary plat and subdivision improvement plans, allowing one or more flag lots to provide access to a constrained portion of the property.
Scott, a city planner, told the commission the phase will extend 650 East south to a cul‑de‑sac, create additional lots and subdivide acreage from two existing parcels. “One of the unique aspects about this subdivision is Lot Number 209,” Scott said, explaining that the configuration makes direct street access impractical and that the only reasonable way to access the developable area is via a flag stem. He told commissioners the project will tie into the city water and sewer systems and into the pressurized secondary (irrigation) water system established with Phase 1.
The staff report cited the code criteria the commission must find to permit flag‑stem lot configurations. Scott summarized those findings in plain terms: that a flag lot would be necessary for efficient use of the land given the parcel shapes, and that other access alternatives were not reasonably practicable. He recommended the commission include those findings and the report’s conditions in a motion approving the preliminary plat.
A commissioner who spoke during discussion said, “I don’t mind flag lots too much … I think it looks like we went to every effort to try and avoid them in this case and I think it makes sense here.” The commission then moved and seconded a motion (movers not named in the record) incorporating the staff findings and conditions. The chair called for the vote; the motion carried and the commission approved the preliminary plat and subdivision improvement plan.
Because this is a single‑family subdivision request within the planning commission’s land‑use authority, Scott noted the item does not need a separate city‑council action unless other code requirements trigger council review. The approval is subject to the conditions and findings listed in the staff report, including fire‑access and frontage/utility construction requirements tied to the Phase 1 improvements.
The commission did not record a roll‑call vote with individual names in the transcript; the chair called the question and announced the motion passed. Next steps for the developer include fulfilling the conditions in the staff report and proceeding with required public‑improvement construction and final plat processing.
