Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Water topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge council to rehabilitate Bridge Street area and prepare for bigger water-infrastructure decisions
Summary
During public comment, residents urged the council to address an undeveloped Bridge Street area as a redevelopment priority and flagged rising water-supply and infrastructure concerns for the city to address publicly.
Two residents used the public-comment portion of the Sept. 8 Georgetown City Council meeting to urge action on a long-neglected area and to press the council for clearer public engagement on water issues.
David Wilson described ownership interests in undeveloped property on Roche (Bridge) Street off Bridge Street and said portions of the road are effectively impassable by vehicle without crossing private property. He asked the city's planning or engineering staff to clarify how property access and road dedication would work so his parcel could be usable for development. Wilson said that historical alignments once crossed railroad tracks and that grading and stability near the creek may limit roadway extension.
Dan Holman, a Georgetown resident and local housing advocate, supported Wilson's call for a focused small-area plan for Bridge Street and noted that the housing needs assessment and the local housing authority had identified the area as an important candidate for rehabilitation. Holman also said residents are discussing water-supply issues on a public Facebook group, that Royal Springs is at capacity and the city is purchasing water from other sources. He cited a potential multi-hundred-million-dollar pipeline option to bring water from Frankfort as an example of the kinds of large decisions the city may face.
Why it matters: Redeveloping an underused corridor like Bridge Street could affect infill housing and rehabilitation priorities, while water-supply capacity constraints have major fiscal and service implications for the city and its utility customers.
Requests to the council and staff: Speakers asked the council to (1) meet with property owners and planning staff to clarify roadway access and possible small-area planning for Bridge Street; and (2) open a public project page and a formal engagement process for water-system questions and studies so residents can find and track proposals, studies and Q&A rather than relying on social media.
Staff response: Utility staff acknowledged receipt of questions and said that many had already been answered from the podium or in writing; staff said they would return with additional answers at upcoming council meetings and explore ways to consolidate documents and public communication.
