Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Taxes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident warns seniors of tax assessment impacts; commissioners approve item 25-0503

5731028 · September 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident told the Durham County Board of Commissioners that rising tax assessments put seniors and low-income homeowners at risk of losing homes; the board then approved consent item 25-0503 by a 5-0 vote. Details of the agenda item were not specified in the public record provided.

A Durham resident urged the Board of County Commissioners to address tax assessment impacts on seniors and low-income homeowners during public comment, and the board subsequently approved consent agenda item 25-0503 by a 5-0 vote.

Randolph Coley, who identified himself as a 75-year-old senior and third-generation homeowner, told commissioners that recent tax assessments are creating a risk of property loss for long-time residents. "I don't wanna be the generation that loses my home. That's all I have to say," he said, describing three houses on his property that "are almost a hundred years old." Coley said he had tried to reach county staff previously and was told his property "hasn't changed in almost a hundred years," but he remains concerned about the financial burden of higher property taxes.

After public comment, the board considered consent agenda item 25-0503. Commissioner Jacobs moved to approve the item and Commissioner Burton seconded. The clerk recorded the motion as carried 5-0.

The transcript does not include substantive details of the agenda item 25-0503 itself (the materials or motion text were not read into the public record excerpt provided). County staff indicated to the speaker that the tax administrator would speak with him following the meeting to follow up on his concerns.

The board did not debate the item on the floor during the excerpted discussion; the motion to approve was recorded and passed unanimously. The record shows the board accepted the consent agenda with 25-0503 pulled for public comment and then approved it after the speaker's remarks.