Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners approve $1.2 million, one-year extension for Tim Prep millings contract

5730668 · September 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Nassau County Board of County Commissioners approved a second amendment to contract CM-3595 with Tim Prep Incorporated to extend the contract through Sept. 30, 2026, in the amount of $1,200,000 to supply millings and lime rock for road maintenance.

The Nassau County Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to approve a one-year extension to its contract with Tim Prep Incorporated for road-material supplies.

The contract extension The board approved a second amendment to contract CM-3595 extending the term for one additional year — expiring Sept. 30, 2026 — with an authorized amount of $1,200,000 to continue supplying millings and lime rock used by the county’s Road and Bridge Department.

Staff presentation and comments A county staff member identified in the record as Mister Campanian explained the contract supplies "millings and lime rock materials for our roadways," and said the extension was requested so the Road and Bridge Department could continue planned work. Commissioner McCullough asked that large-dollar items be placed on the public record; he said, "Anything over a million dollars, I always feel that the public has purview to know exactly what we're doing." Commissioners invited questions; none altered the request.

Vote and implementation The motion to approve the amendment passed 4-0 with commissioners present. The county indicated the materials support ongoing pavement-management and road-maintenance programs and that the Road and Bridge Department will continue to use these contract materials through the extended term.

What remains unspecified The contract-excerpt and staff remarks did not include details about procurement history (competitive bids or sole-source justification) or the exact spend-to-date under the contract; the staff member said he did not have all the information at the podium and was available for questions.