Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinances And Resolutions Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Easley council holds second readings and resolutions; votes to enter executive session on pending claim
Summary
At its Sept. 8 meeting the council conducted second readings on multiple items — a rezoning, a business-license update and an easement — and read several resolutions; the council voted to enter executive session to receive legal advice on a pending claim.
City of Easley councilors conducted second readings or first readings as listed on the Sept. 8 agenda and recorded limited discussion on several items before moving to other business and an executive session.
The council confirmed on the record a second reading of ordinance 2025-07, a rezoning request to change about 0.844 acres at 715 North A Street from Neighborhood Commercial to Residential 7.5; councilors raised traffic-access concerns related to a permanent median adjacent to the site and asked staff to ensure shared-driveway or DOT review if homes are built.
Council also took second reading on ordinance 2025-08 (a revised business-license ordinance to align with state Business License Standardization Act) and on ordinance 2025-09 (authorizing recording an easement for properties across the Doodle Trail to formalize longstanding driveway access). Those items drew little additional debate.
Two resolutions related to equipment leases for parks and recreation (resolutions 2025-14 and 2025-15) and a resolution (2025-16) calling on state and county authorities to review congestion along the Brushy Creek Road corridor were presented; staff said the lease items were included in the budget and the finance company required council signoff. Council did not record a final roll-call vote on these readings and resolutions during the transcript segment.
Executive session
Council moved and voted to go into executive session to receive legal advice on a pending claim under section 34-70(a)(2) (statutory citation given on the record); a council member requested the record show the matter was related to "Mets versus the City of Easley," and another member clarified the case is the City of Columbia rather than the City of Easley. The vote to enter executive session was recorded as approved on the record.
What was decided
Most ordinance items were read on the record but no final adoption votes appear in the transcript excerpt. The council approved a motion to go into executive session for legal advice on a pending claim and identified the case for the record.
Provenance
Staff introduced the rezoning matter (ordinance 2025-07) and the business-license ordinance in the first portion of the meeting; the easement item across the Doodle Trail and the resolutions were read aloud later in the agenda.
