Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors approve jail promotions and lieutenant personnel changes
Summary
The Wright County Board approved promotions and salary adjustments for jail staff and accepted changes in the sheriff's lieutenant rank: two jail staff received $2,000 raises and promotions, and personnel changes in the sheriff's office were approved; motions passed unanimously.
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Wright County Board of Supervisors approved personnel changes affecting the county jail and sheriff’s office, including promotions and salary adjustments.
A speaker identified only as Jason presented two promotions for county jail staff: promotion of Sheila Bordeiro to jail administrator with a $2,000 annual raise, and promotion of Kristen (last name not specified in the record) to assistant jail administrator with a $2,000 raise. Jason said those raises could be accommodated within the existing budget and that the net payroll effect would be handled by reallocating the departing incumbent’s $2,000. The board approved the presented promotions and salary adjustments by motion and voice vote; the record shows the motion was seconded and carried with all ayes.
Jason also outlined changes in the sheriff’s office rank structure. He said an incumbent lieutenant, Adam (last name not given), elected to return to a deputy position. The board approved promotion of Tony (last name not given) to the lieutenant position and an associated change in shift supervision. That motion, covering both lieutenant and deputy status changes, was seconded and approved unanimously.
The meeting record includes a short county revenue report from the sheriff’s office for service mileage, permits and related fees (total reported as $3,024.81); supervisors moved to receive the report and approved it by voice vote.
No individual vote tallies or last names for several staff members were recorded in the minutes beyond the board’s unanimous voice approvals. The motions approved were administrative personnel actions; the board did not set additional policy directions at the meeting.

