Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Lodging topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developers, staff and DRB seek county‑commission guidance after Hotel Rain raises Inlet Beach plan discrepancy

5717996 · August 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The DRB discussed a proposal for a 78‑room Hotel Rain at 30 Avenue and found a likely citation error in the Inlet Beach neighborhood plan that could limit lodging types; the board continued the item to Oct. 2 and staff said the county commission or attorney must resolve the code discrepancy.

Developers seeking approval for a 78‑room, four‑story boutique hotel at 30 Avenue in Inlet Beach ran into a code citation discrepancy that prompted Walton County planning staff and the Development Review Board to pause review and seek guidance from the county commission or county attorney.

Travis Altman, the project architect with Dale Partners, described Hotel Rain as “a 78 room boutique hotel, 4 stories” with a sunken first floor, an inward‑facing courtyard and an integrated parking garage. Tim Brown and Steven Schoen of county planning told the board there is a likely error in the Inlet Beach neighborhood plan language that cites the wrong LDC section for "limited lodging." Schoen said the plan’s language currently reads that limited lodging is permitted “as described in neighborhood commercial section 2.23,” which the staff believes is a typographical or citation error and could be read to allow lodging far larger than the neighborhood plan intended.

"There is a mistake, for all intents and purposes, in the Inlet Beach neighborhood plan," Schoen said. He told the DRB that because the citation appears to conflict with the neighborhood plan’s statement limiting bed‑and‑breakfast facilities to no more than 10 lodging rooms, the county needs a determination from the Board of County Commissioners or the county attorney before moving the project forward. Schoen said the applicant has invested in the process but staff cannot unilaterally correct the neighborhood plan.

Board members raised concerns about scale, screening and lighting. Members asked the applicant to coordinate parking‑garage lighting color and intensity with the existing 30 Avenue development and discussed buffering on the garage side that faces adjacent residences. One board member suggested green‑screen landscaping as a mitigation measure. The applicant said balcony corridors face inward to reduce light and sound impacts, and that HVAC equipment will be screened so it is not visible from the street.

The DRB voted to continue the Hotel Rain application to the Oct. 2 DRB meeting to allow staff, the applicant and the county legal team to meet and determine whether the neighborhood plan citation requires correction before the project proceeds.

Why it matters: the neighborhood plan language and the LDC citation affect what lodging types and sizes are allowed in Inlet Beach. Staff said an incorrect cross‑reference could be interpreted as permitting much larger limited‑lodging projects than the neighborhood plan text intends.

What’s next: the applicant and county staff will meet with legal counsel and the Board of County Commissioners to determine whether the parcel may proceed under current code or if a text correction is required; the project remains scheduled for the DRB’s Oct. 2 meeting.