Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Security Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves requirement for mandatory lethal‑weapon training for armed security guards and investigators
Summary
Bill 36‑0136 would require standardized training, certification and annual requalification for privately employed armed security guards and investigators; POSE, VIPD and the Attorney General supported the measure.
The Committee on Homeland Security, Justice and Public Safety voted to forward Bill 36‑0136, sponsored by Senator Avery L. Lewis, which would require mandatory lethal‑weapon training, certification, periodic requalification and reporting for private security guards and investigators who carry firearms in the territory.
Sponsor testimony described the measure as a public‑safety and professional‑standards bill that would require scenario‑based training, use‑of‑force instruction, de‑escalation techniques, legal and ethical standards, and periodic re‑qualification. The bill provides waivers for active and retired law‑enforcement officers and sets fines and fees for certification and renewal.
The Peace Officer Standards and Training Council (POSE), the Virgin Islands Police Department and the Attorney General’s office testified in strong support. POSE recommended specific curriculum components, psychological and physical fitness screening, and continuing education requirements. POSE and VIPD recommended setting minimum firearms proficiency hours (POSE referenced an 80‑hour firearms standard for comparability with existing post standards) and annual or periodic re‑qualification for use‑of‑force and firearms proficiency; they also recommended scenario‑based and life‑safety training (first aid/trauma response) and clear oversight by the commissioner of police or the VIPD training division.
The Attorney General’s office said territories may lawfully require licensing and training for armed private security and that the measure fits within common state practices, but suggested some reordering of statutory sections for clarity. Several senators said the proposal would strengthen public trust by ensuring private armed personnel meet professional standards.
The committee voted to approve the bill as moved; roll call recorded five yes votes and two absences. The bill will move to Rules and Judiciary for further drafting and implementation planning.
