Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Poulsbo council weighs local option under HB 2015 for public-safety funding; staff recommends retreat discussion

5716059 · September 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City Administrator Rob Gelder briefed the council on House Bill 2015 funding options, including a council-adopted 0.1% local sales-and-use tax and a state grant program. Staff recommended discussing priorities at a council retreat and incorporating options into the 2027 budget cycle.

City Administrator Rob Gelder briefed the Poulsbo City Council on Sept. 3 about House Bill 2015, a state law that created two funding paths for public-safety and alternative-response programs: a state grant fund and a new local option sales-and-use tax of 0.1% that municipalities can adopt by council action.

Gelder said the legislature appropriated $100 million for a three-year grant program that prioritizes co-response programs, hiring and training of officers and crisis responder programs. Eligibility for the local sales-tax option requires meeting grant-related prerequisites; those prerequisites informed staff's recommendation. The local option tax would be permanent and councilmanic (no referendum required), and the Department of Revenue requires 75 days' notice to implement a change, effective only on Jan. 1, April 1 or July 1 dates.

Using Poulsbo's historic sales-tax base, staff estimated that a city-level 0.1% tax would generate about $650,000 a year. If both the city and Kitsap County adopted the 0.1% tax, the rates would stack; that scenario would add the county share on top of a city adoption. Gelder emphasized that funds collected by different jurisdictions are not automatically shared.

Council members discussed timing, competitive grant chances and the uses for revenue. Several members said a retreat would be the appropriate venue to prioritize uses (for example, hiring officers, co-response teams, diversion and reentry services or behavioral-health placements) and align the decision with the 2027 budget timeline. No formal action was taken at the Sept. 3 meeting; staff proposed returning to council at a December or January retreat to refine priorities and a possible implementation timetable.