Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sustainability Leed topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Overland Park achieves LEED for Cities Gold, staff highlights water and waste areas for improvement

5713093 · September 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Overland Park staff reported the city earned LEED for Cities Gold certification; staff said water consumption and waste-tracking were the lowest-performing measures and outlined next steps to improve scores.

City sustainability staff told the Community Development Committee that Overland Park achieved LEED for Cities Gold under the U.S. Green Building Council process and previewed areas for future improvement.

"We did end up with LEED Gold," a sustainability staff member said, noting the program’s scoring categories and the city’s performance across measures that include buildings, transportation, natural systems and resource management. The staff member said the LEED for Cities cohort was sponsored by Bank of America and that the application process required cross-departmental data collection.

Why it matters: LEED for Cities provides a quantitative baseline of municipal sustainability performance and a framework for follow-up. City staff said the certification confirms existing programs and identifies weak points for policy and operational attention.

Performance highlights and shortcomings: Staff pointed to several strong or innovative programs — including Deanna Rose Farmstead, floating wetlands, an active neighborhood leadership program, a platinum-certified police OP CAT team and a teen-council program — which helped earn innovation and regional-priority points. At the same time, staff said the city’s water-performance and waste-performance metrics were low: water use per capita is relatively high (in part because of large lawns and golf-course irrigation) and regional waste-tracking is complicated by cross-jurisdictional collection, which limits the city’s ability to measure local recycling rates. "We almost didn't even qualify" on the ARC metrics without addressing water and waste performance, the presenter said.

Process, next steps and outreach: Staff said Johnson County and utility partners provided data and that some improvements rely on external stakeholders (for example, WaterOne and the county waste system). Staff plans to celebrate the certification at the Sept. 15 city council meeting and to use forthcoming plans (urban forest plan, natural-resources plans and EV readiness) to pursue higher scores on resubmission cycles. The presenter also said staff intends to resubmit every few years and pursue additional points where feasible.

Ending: Staff characterized the Gold certification as a baseline achievement and described a set of practical follow-ups — from waste-study results to water-conservation coordination with utilities — that will guide future work to raise the city’s rating.