Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Protocols topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cobb County judicial-led protocol aims to treat chronic absenteeism as upstream intervention to reduce dropouts and justice involvement
Summary
Chief Superior Court Judge Anne Harris outlined Cobb County’s cross‑sector attendance protocol and Project Pivot, emphasizing local, data‑driven, multiagency interventions and a five‑day truancy notification system.
Get email alerts on the Local Protocols topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chief Superior Court Judge Anne Harris told the Senate Study Committee that chronic absenteeism is the “canary in the coal mine” for later dropout and delinquency, and described Cobb County’s locally developed attendance protocol and Project Pivot pilot.
Judge Harris said Cobb County’s protocol, launched officially Jan. 29, assigns named stakeholder organizations and staff leads, requires coordinated data collection, and sets a five‑day truancy notification and progressive pre‑court discipline process that escalates to court only after community and school‑level interventions have been tried.
“When the court gets involved? What does that look like? You know, children in need of services, protective orders, dependency cases, things like that,” Judge Harris said, explaining the protocol’s escalation steps. She told the committee the protocol includes interventions aimed at school climate, behavior, parental engagement and wraparound services. The protocol’s signatories include education, juvenile court, social services, law‑enforcement and mental‑health agencies; Cobb’s initial signing event included 38 entities.
Judge Harris said 16 judicial circuits had developed some level of protocol covering about 37 counties as of midsummer, and that the statutory deadline for establishing protocols is June (the statute was referenced during the hearing). She described Project Pivot as a multi‑agency, community‑based risk‑reduction panel to connect juvenile court staff, social services, parents and community agencies with targeted plans for students identified through the local review process.
Judge Harris and others emphasized local variation: what works in Cobb may not be appropriate in Southwest Georgia; protocols need boots‑on‑the‑ground staff and authoritative signatories who can act. She also urged integrating parents and students into committees to surface causes such as parental unawareness of absences, housing instability and childcare responsibilities that keep older students out of class.
Committee members asked whether Cobb updated handbooks and parent notices; Judge Harris and local partners confirmed the schools coordinated updates and that protocols and tiered steps are documented and shared with parents.

