Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legal topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alma commission follows counsel’s recommendation on Ralston litigation after closed session

5767037 · September 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a closed session, the commission voted to follow counsel’s advice regarding settlement negotiations and pending litigation Ralston v. Alma et al.; the motion passed by voice vote.

The Alma City Commission convened in closed session and afterward moved to follow the advice and recommendation of counsel regarding settlement negotiations and pending litigation in the case captioned Ralston v. Alma et al.

On returning to open session, a commissioner moved that the commission follow counsel’s recommendation related to the settlement negotiations and pending litigation Ralston v. Alma et al.; the motion was supported and approved on a voice vote.

Earlier in the meeting, the commission took a roll-call vote to go into closed session. The roll call recorded Commissioner Wernick absent; Commissioner Ullman, yes; Commissioner Baer, yes; Commissioner Gibson, absent; Vice Mayor Harrington, yes; Commissioner Pitts, yes; and Mayor May, yes.

No additional details of the settlement terms or litigation were read into the public record during the open session; staff said they expected to take action when the commission returned from closed session and did so by following counsel’s recommendation.