Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Leavenworth County Commission actions include fund transfer, rezoning and RHID consideration

5710264 · September 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the meeting commissioners approved a Register of Deeds tech fund transfer and a rezoning request; the Reinvestment Housing Incentive District (Fairlane Townhomes Phase 2) generated extensive debate and multiple procedural motions and requires clarification in the official minutes for final disposition.

Key formal actions recorded during the Leavenworth County Commission meeting:

1) Board Order 2025‑11 — Register of Deeds tech fund transfer - Motion: Approve Board Order 2025‑11 to transfer $92,000 from the Register of Deeds Tech Fund to the BOCC Equipment Fund. - Purpose: $34,000 proposed for a scanning/digitization project (public works and planning & zoning) and $58,000 for the appraisers' aerial photography contract for the year, per the Register of Deeds presentation. - Vote / outcome: Motion carried on roll call as recorded in the meeting packet and transcript.

2) Rezoning KHDEV2574 — Springdale Road parcels - Motion: Approve rezoning KHDEV2574 (21443 Springdale Road) from RR‑5 to RR‑2.5 and adopt Resolution 2025‑30, consistent with the future land use map. - Vote / outcome: Planning Commission recommended approval; the commission approved the rezoning by roll call per the transcript.

3) Fairlane Townhomes Phase 2 RHID — multiple motions - Motion(s): Commissioners considered a developer request to create a 20‑year RHID for 21 rental units in Lansing. The commission debated and initially recorded a vote described in the transcript as 3‑2 in favor of creation. Later in the meeting staff noted the statutory default effect and advised rewording records; a subsequent motion was made (Resolution 2025‑31) to find an adverse effect and nullify the RHID. The transcript excerpted does not contain an unambiguous final roll‑call tally for that nullification motion; the minutes should be checked for the definitive recorded outcome. - Key packet numbers: Developer‑stated RHID cap approximately $852,000; county staff memo estimated a net county positive of $14,807 over the RHID term; developer estimated the project would generate almost $68,000 in additional county taxes over the term (different projections are in the record).

What the public record shows and next steps - The Register of Deeds fund transfer and the KHDEV2574 rezoning were approved on their motions and will be implemented by county departments per normal processes. - Because of statutory timing and the mechanics of RHID approvals, county staff advised rephrasing the RHID motion/record to ensure the commission's intent was accurately captured; the transcript shows the reworded motion and a vote but the provided audio transcript excerpt lacks a clear final roll call for the nullification motion. The official minutes and the posted resolution text should be consulted for the final legal disposition of the Fairlane RHID item.

Speakers and sources for these actions are cited in the county packet and the meeting transcript.