Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enrollment Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rapid City Area Schools report 267‑student drop; district highlights attendance work and outreach
Summary
Superintendent Kit Thompson told the board the district is down 267 students year over year and flagged attendance—districtwide rate 92.87%—as a key driver of long‑term outcomes; board members asked for better tracking of where students go and for enrollment to be a strategic goal.
Get email alerts on the Enrollment Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent Kit Thompson told the Rapid City Area School District 51‑4 Board of Education that district enrollment has decreased by 267 students from the same time last year and said the district is focusing on attendance as an early intervention to improve outcomes.
The enrollment and attendance presentation showed some schools gained students, Thompson said, but the districtwide snapshot “has decreased by 267 students.” She told the board the district’s overall attendance rate for the reporting period is 92.87%, 0.27 percentage points below the same time last year, and emphasized research linking attendance to reading proficiency and graduation: “a student who can't read on grade level by third grade is four times less likely to graduate by age 19.”
Why it matters: Board members and administrators framed falling enrollment as both an operational and revenue issue. Board member Christine Stephenson called the 267‑student decline “staggering” and asked the board to make enrollment an explicit strategic goal. Board member Walt Swan pressed staff on whether the district is able to track where students go after they leave the district; Thompson and other staff said state data on homeschoolers and some private school movements are limited and that the district can track students only when records requests are received.
Thompson and Assistant/Deputy leaders stressed attendance’s instructional importance. Thompson highlighted that all elementary schools reported attendance above 90% in the snapshot, while North Middle School, Central High School and alternative programs were below 90%, and warned that without intervention small declines can compound across grades and years. “If a student misses two days a month, that means they'll miss 20 days of school in a year,” Thompson said, listing the instructional hours lost in core subjects.
Board reaction and next steps: Several board members asked for more granular data. Stephenson and others asked for classroom‑ and grade‑level trend analysis—e.g., whether cohort dropouts begin after particular grades—and proposed adding enrollment to the board retreat agenda. Thompson said the district has convened a district attendance committee and will continue policy review and targeted supports; board members Angela Rafferty and Donna Moore reported attending the committee meeting the same day.
Thompson and board members also discussed the budget implications: Chief financial staff noted state aid has declined over multi‑year trends tied to enrollment changes and that year‑to‑year budgeting is structured around an enrollment estimate. The board asked staff to return with updated visuals for the official count date and to continue work on early‑grade supports and community outreach planned through Attendance Awareness Month events.
The board did not adopt a new enrollment policy at the meeting; members directed staff to continue data collection, the attendance committee work and to bring recommended metrics and potential strategic goals to the retreat.

