Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Finance Asset Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bonner County commissioners remove $4,194.36 auto-body claim from consent agenda after debate over cosmetic repair
Summary
Commissioners pulled a $4,194.36 risk claim for cosmetic repairs to a county truck from the consent agenda for further review and directed risk staff to confirm whether touch-up paint is needed to prevent corrosion.
Get email alerts on the County Finance Asset Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bonner County commissioners on Monday removed a $4,194.36 risk claim for cosmetic repairs to a county motor-pool truck from the consent agenda after commissioners questioned whether the damage required full repair.
The item, presented by Christian Jocelyn, Bonner County risk manager, described a sub-$5,000 auto-body claim that the motor pool submitted following discovery of a scratch on a county truck. Jocelyn told the board that the motor pool promptly reported the damage and that the claim followed the county's risk-management policy.
Commissioners pressed staff about whether the damage was merely cosmetic or exposed metal that could cause corrosion. One commissioner said he did not see a functional reason to spend roughly $4,100 for a cosmetic repair, while another suggested limited touch-up paint if inspection showed exposed metal. A third suggested replacing a plastic bumper cover as a lower-cost cosmetic option.
Wayne Martin, a Bonner County resident, commented during public testimony, noting vehicle parking locations and urging the county to examine where vehicles are staged to reduce incidents.
After discussion, a motion to approve the consent agenda excluding the auto-body repair item passed. Commissioners said they want risk staff to inspect the vehicle and confirm whether a touch-up is needed to protect exposed metal; if so, they would consider the least expensive option to prevent corrosion. The auto-body claim will return for deliberation at a later meeting.
The remainder of the consent agenda, which included multiple equipment and software purchases, proceeded separately.
Commissioners did not vote to approve or deny the claim at Monday's meeting; the item was removed from the consent agenda for further review.

