Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve phase 1 ball-field plan at Rose Street, authorize survey; 4–1 vote
Summary
After debate about locations and public access, the board voted 4–1 to proceed with phase 1: two ball fields proposed on Board of Education property off Rose Street, and approved a survey to clear title and facilitate property swaps.
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Alleghany County Board of Commissioners voted 4–1 to approve a Phase 1 ball-field plan to construct two playing fields on Board of Education property left of Rose Street and to authorize a property survey to support necessary releases and any land swaps.
Commissioner discussion focused on site selection, long-term capacity and public access. Several commissioners and members of the recreation committee described the Rose Street site as relatively flat and suitable for two fields with minimal initial site work. Other commissioners recommended evaluating alternative county-owned sites, including Veterans Park and land near the bus garage, citing concerns about flood- or wetland-prone areas, future expansion potential and public-use access when schools are in session.
Garrison (surname only in transcript) and others supported moving the project forward at the Rose Street site; one commissioner said he preferred exploring county-owned sites before committing. The vote to move forward with the Rose Street plan was 4 in favor, 1 opposed. The board subsequently approved a separate motion to commission a survey of the school-owned property to prepare legal descriptions needed for a potential lien release and property exchanges; that survey motion also passed by unanimous vote.
Staff and the school system discussed existing grants tied to specific parcels and the need to execute appraisals, surveys and coordinated land transfers so that values match when swapping properties. County staff said Truist (the school’s lender) has indicated a willingness to release liens on parcels that do not include school buildings, but that a legal description and survey are required.
Funding for the first phase was described as a combination of county and school funds and some grants. Staff said the package includes approximately $452,000 already identified (school and county sources and a $20,000 grant mentioned), but that a full project budget and design-phase price estimates would be produced following an RFQ/RFP for design services.
Why it matters: Commissioners must balance community recreation needs, future expansion and public access while working through legal steps to clear property titles and coordinate grant conditions with the school board. Supporters said two fields at Rose Street meet near-term needs; opponents urged a fuller site analysis to preserve future expansion options.
Next steps: The board authorized the survey and directed staff to coordinate with the school system on required surveys, appraisals and any memorandum of understanding to define school and public access times; staff said design and cost details will be presented after the RFQ/design phase.

