Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Setback Pools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council to amend zoning language after front-yard pool exposes ordinance gap on building line
Summary
A permit for a pool that extends about 8½ feet past a property's building line exposed inconsistent ordinance language. Staff will draft a zoning text amendment and take it through planning commission and council this fall.
Lake Jackson — Councilors discussed revising the city's zoning language after a permitted pool and screened enclosure at 420 Forest Drive highlighted a gap between the defined front-yard setback and the building line.
City planner David told council staff discovered, during a recent permit appeal, that the city code prohibits a fence in front of the building line but does not explicitly bar other detached accessory structures — such as pools, sheds, garages or fenced courtyards — from extending past that building line. Because of that wording gap, a homeowner obtained a permit for a pool that sits inside a screened enclosure and extends about 8 to 8½ feet beyond the property’s building line.
Neighbors spoke at the meeting. Eric, who lives across the street, said the structure is “big enough” to attract neighborhood children and expressed concern about security and noise. Jeri Masterson, who lives next door at 421 Forest Drive, said she supports changing the ordinance to keep accessory structures at or behind the building line and suggested a one-time variance allowing a matching brick wall at the specific property to provide privacy, security and sound attenuation.
Staff and council discussed options. Staff said the pool itself meets state enclosure requirements but that screens can be more easily damaged than a fence or masonry wall. City staff recommended a text amendment clarifying that the building line is the furthest forward point on the property for all accessory structures, not just fences.
Council directed staff to prepare the zoning text amendment for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and then council. Planners are scheduled to meet in October; staff said the change could reach final adoption in November if council and planners move expeditiously. Meanwhile, staff said the city’s Zoning Board of Adjustment retains authority over one-time variances if the homeowner requests one.
No retroactive enforcement against the already-permitted pool was enacted at the Sept. 2 meeting; staff said the permit was approved under the existing code language and the upcoming ordinance change is intended to prevent future similar permits.
