Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Supply Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Edmond Planning Commission approves three-lot split, grants variance for water connection, 4-0

5706776 · September 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Edmond Planning Commission on Sept. 2 approved a three-lot split for about 5.6 acres on the west side of Mountain View Lane and granted a variance to the city's water-connection requirement because staff found no feasible way to connect to the public supply; the commission voted 4-0 and referred the item to city council for Sept. 22.

The Edmond Planning Commission on Sept. 2 approved a three-lot split for roughly 5.6 acres located about a quarter-mile north of Second Street on the west side of Mountain View Lane, voted 4-0 to grant a variance to the city's water-connection requirement, and sent the application to the Edmond City Council for consideration on Sept. 22.

City planner Mr. Bridal told commissioners the application proposes to divide the existing lot into three lots ranging in size from approximately 80,000 square feet to almost 87,000 square feet and includes a variance to the city's connection-to-water-supply code. “This application also includes a variance to Title 13.12.065 … connection to water supply. Staff concurs with the applicant that there is not a feasible way to connect to the public water supply,” Mr. Bridal said.

Commissioners asked for clarification about why a connection to the public water system was not feasible; staff explained that although there is public water in the nearby development to the west, there is no easement to make the connection and a distribution connection would require running a water line to Second Street, which staff said may be a transmission line rather than a distribution line. That constraint was described in the meeting as the primary reason the applicant requested a variance; the transcript did not specify the applicant's preferred alternative water supply, but commissioners and staff discussed the practical implication that lots could rely on wells if the variance is approved.

The applicant was present and offered to answer questions. No members of the public spoke on the item. The commission approved the lot split and variance by a 4-0 vote and referred the case (DD25-7) to the City Council meeting on Sept. 22 for final action.

The variance in this case was specific to Title 13.12.065 (connection to water supply); the transcript did not specify other conditions or required follow-up actions beyond the council referral.