Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Urban Forest Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conservation board revises tree ordinance draft and plans advisory panel to pursue Tree City USA designation
Summary
Advisers reviewed a working draft of a town tree ordinance, narrowed its scope to publicly owned trees and right-of-way plantings, discussed definitions and a community forestry plan, and recommended forming a tree advisory panel tied to the Conservation Advisory Board to meet Tree City USA application requirements.
Members of the Grand Island Conservation Advisory Board spent the meeting reviewing a working draft of a tree ordinance and discussing edits intended to align the law with the town's Community Forestry Management Plan and with the requirements for Tree City USA designation.
Scope and title: Board members favored changing the ordinance title to emphasize "public tree conservation and management" and agreed the law should address trees located on town-owned property and in the public right-of-way rather than private-yard plantings. Diane and others urged that the ordinance explicitly define "public trees" and "public right-of-way" up front so the text is clear.
Definitions and thresholds: The draft included an existing definition that used diameter-at-breast-height thresholds (for example, 6 inches at 4.5 feet) inherited from earlier drafts. Members debated simplifying the text by using the town's existing community-forestry definition or by keeping a size threshold tied to replacement rules. Several members argued for a practical approach: use the town's community-forest inventory definitions and avoid overly narrow, technical thresholds that would exclude smaller ornamental trees.
Tree advisory board and Tree City USA: The group discussed creating a town Tree Advisory Board or designating a subcommittee of the Conservation Advisory Board with representatives from parks and highways. Members noted Tree City USA's application asks for a named contact (such as a department head) and for evidence of a municipal tree program. The advisory board recommended a committee that includes CAB members plus representatives from the parks department and highway superintendent (or their designees) and that the committee meet on a regular basis and provide an annual report.
Planting guidance and public right-of-way: Members agreed to add an appendix or town website list of appropriate right-of-way tree species and to require coordination with town staff before planting in public rights-of-way so plantings do not conflict with utilities or future capital projects.
Process and next steps: Members who were editing the draft said they would convert the available PDF to an editable version, incorporate agreed changes (title, definitions, committee language, and an approved species list) and circulate the revised draft for further review. The board also discussed removing provisions intended for private-property enforcement from the public-tree-focused draft and leaving enforcement language to town code lawyers as needed.
Ending: The board agreed to continue edits and to prepare language that the town can submit with a Tree City USA application, including identification of a municipal contact and an outline of responsibilities for a tree advisory committee.
