Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Field Trips topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Portland SD 1J policy committee weighs major rewrite of field trip rules, asks staff for redline and data
Summary
Policy committee members discussed a draft that would move detailed approvals for school trips from the board to staff via an administrative directive, asked staff to produce a redlined comparison and annual trip data, and requested input from risk management and building administrators.
The Portland School District 1J Policy Committee on an unspecified date discussed a draft rewrite of the district's field trip policy that would shift detailed approval authority from the board to district staff and administrative directive procedures.
Committee members said the stated objective of the draft is to reduce what members described as undue board oversight and administrative burden while preserving student safety and equity. "What is the objective of the policy?" Director Wong asked during the discussion, urging the committee to identify problems the draft should solve before refining language.
Proponents, including a committee member who described numerous principal conversations, said the 2019 policy amendment had produced cumbersome requirements that can disincentivize field trips and complicate capstone and DLI (dual-language immersion) activities. "Our current field trip policy was actually drafted a few years ago'it came from a single parent complaint'and it created a situation where it actually created more cumbersome administration for everybody," Eddie said.
Several committee members said the draft would keep the policy'level statement of purpose (equitable, accessible and safe field trips) while allowing an Administrative Directive (AD) and risk management to specify how approvals are implemented. "The reason I wrote the policy this way is because it allows the administrative directive and risk management to be the ones that write the AD, the appropriate procedure," one committee member said.
Other members raised transparency and legal concerns about removing board visibility entirely. One committee member said the existing approach gives the community a chance to see travel through the consent agenda and that removing that could permit out-of-state trips without public oversight: "This policy as it stands allows a school to go to Vancouver without anyone overseeing," the committee member said, adding that cross-state travel can raise legal implications.
The committee unanimously directed staff to prepare materials for further review rather than advance the draft to the full board. Specifically, members asked staff to:
- Prepare a redlined comparison showing changes between the draft and the current policy so committee members can see what would be replaced.
- Produce a summary of differences and circulate relevant elements of the existing Administrative Directive and risk-management procedures (staff said the AD and related materials run about 11'12 pages).
- Provide a list of field trips districtwide for a multi-year window (committee members requested roughly 10'12 years where available, and noted COVID years affect comparability) and any data tied to the equitable field trip fund tracking that the board previously created.
- Solicit input from risk management staff (committee members asked to invite Kristen Wheeler) and building administrators and principals, who committee members said are positioned to report on practical issues that arise when trips are planned.
Committee members discussed possible tiered approval processes in which short, routine trips (for example, local outings) would follow a streamlined procedure while overnight or long-distance travel would require more rigorous review. Members also discussed exemptions or standing approvals for recurring, qualifying programs (for example, teams that routinely qualify for national competitions) to address timing problems when boards meet monthly.
The discussion included equity concerns. One committee member said the 2019 policy had disproportionately affected DLI programs and Asian families by adding cost and administrative layers, and asked staff to retrieve the pre-2019 policy for comparison. "This 2019 policy was specifically targeted at Asian DLI programs," that member said.
No formal vote or change to district policy occurred at the meeting. The committee agreed to return the draft to staff with the directions above and to review the staff-prepared redline, summary and data at a future meeting.
Ending
Committee members set next steps: staff will prepare the redline and summary, circulate relevant AD and risk-management material, request multi-year field-trip data and invite risk-management personnel and building administrators to the next policy meeting for further discussion.
