Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Revitalization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Porterville committee outlines vision for downtown: events, cohesion, maps and incentives
Summary
Members of the Porterville Downtown Committee spent an extended session brainstorming a mission and short‑ and long‑term goals for downtown revitalization, reviewing zoning maps and discussing grants and sign‑ordinance changes. The committee approved meeting minutes and agreed to move two agenda items to the next meeting.
Porterville Downtown Committee members on an hour‑long planning session focused on crafting a mission, vision and near‑term goals to draw visitors and strengthen downtown businesses.
Chair Ed McCurvey opened the discussion by asking the committee to “think big” about downtown and to center its work on a shared mission and family‑focused values, saying the group should aim to “reimagine downtown” rather than focus only on maintenance tasks.
The committee heard a public comment from Josh Flowers, who urged creative, experiential draws — for example, 3‑D projections and timed public moments — to bring highway traffic off the road and into downtown: “You get to reimagine the entire downtown culture,” Flowers said. He urged committee members to prioritize attractions that create an experience rather than additional regulation.
Nut graf: Committee members and staff sketched a package of practical and promotional ideas — coordinated events and music, clearer communication and a master calendar, façade and small grants, public art and historical placards — and reviewed zoning maps and regulatory plans that will shape next steps. Staff said existing city work on street repairs and lighting should create a baseline the committee can build upon.
Most immediate items discussed included boosting regular programming and events to increase foot traffic, improving communication about those events, and using small grants and incentive programs to help property owners improve storefronts. City staff reported an existing small grants program administered through the city’s cannabis‑grant process that provides awards capped at $5,000; staff said the city plans to distribute nearly $100,000 in such grants by this fall. Committee members also recalled an earlier facade grant program that provided awards of roughly $25,000.
Committee members recommended a mix of short‑ and long‑term actions: a weekly or regular focus time (a daily or evening “moment” to concentrate activity), themed events (festivals, farmers markets, music), historical placards and guided walks, mural and public‑art programs, coordinated holiday activities (including a shared Santa schedule rather than competing events), and efforts to encourage building owners to keep storefronts open or otherwise activate windows. Sam Zens emphasized keeping regulation light: “Less regulation,” he said, arguing the committee should make it easier for merchants and organizers to stage activities.
Staff and planners joined the discussion. City Manager Richard (last name not specified in the transcript) and planning staff member Oscar explained how the city’s zoning categories affect permitted uses in downtown, noting several downtown designations (downtown general/service commercial, downtown professional office, downtown retail north/south, RS2 residential and public/semi‑public zones). Oscar said many downtown zones already permit mixed uses — retail, office and second‑story residential — but ground‑floor residences on Main Street may require a conditional use permit. He also said the city is reviewing and simplifying the zoning code and that the general plan (adopted in 2008) provides the top‑level guidance for district designations.
The committee reviewed PDF maps and a web map component staff said would be provided to members for zooming and further review. McCurvey asked members to consider parking behind Main Street as the preferred approach for increased visitor parking and to start thinking about goals to bring back to the next meeting.
Members also discussed regulation and permitting barriers for events. Participants said current requirements for block parties can include long lead times, nonprofit sponsorship and high insurance limits, which can deter small or business‑led events. McCurvey and others asked staff to explore ways to make permitting easier for recurring or low‑risk events.
The committee also discussed planned citywide sign‑ordinance changes. Staff said the council is reviewing sign code updates, with a public hearing scheduled in September, and encouraged the committee to participate in the public process as it finalizes goals.
Votes at a glance: • Motion to approve minutes from the previous meeting — outcome: approved. Mover/second: not specified in the transcript. Vote: unanimous among members present (names recorded below). • Motion to move agenda items 4 and 5 to the next meeting — outcome: passed unanimously.
The meeting concluded with staff agreeing to circulate the maps, a summary of the brainstormed goals and links to the zoning and sign‑ordinance materials before the next meeting, scheduled for Sept. 25. McCurvey asked members to rank priorities and prepare goal suggestions for the next session.
Ending: The committee did not adopt policy changes at this meeting; its work was planning and direction‑setting. Staff and the planning department will provide supporting materials and links so members can refine goals and prepare recommendations for future council consideration.
