Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Transfer‑station construction hits inspection and electrical snags; commissioners ask for fuller review
Summary
Construction and inspection issues at the county transfer station prompted staff and contractors to pause some work pending updated stamped plans and inspection paperwork; county buildings staff and contractors will meet and commissioners asked for a joint update before approving larger change orders.
Valley County buildings and grounds staff reported Wednesday that work at the county transfer station and related annex building remains partially on hold while required special‑inspection reports, updated stamped drawings and certain conduit repairs are completed.
Facilities staff said an external special‑inspection contractor (Great West/GPI) has been performing compaction, rebar, concrete samples and other required testing, and that inspection reports must be routed to the county’s reviewer before some construction elements can continue. The county’s building official has asked for updated stamped plans reflecting recent change orders so the official can complete the required reviews.
Key construction issues discussed included damaged or weathered electrical conduit feeding outdoor service panels, a sagging mounted service run that facilities staff question whether to relocate onto a pedestal away from the building, and a set of conduits under the building slab that will require repair. County staff and the engineer debated alternatives: (1) relocate and pedestal‑mount the service several feet from the building, which would require additional work and cost; or (2) repair conduits in place and add a modest weather cover or shed roof for protection.
Commissioners pressed staff to gather more detailed input from the project electrical contractor, the engineer and internal facilities staff before approving any large additional change orders. Facilities staff said some of the conduit and riser repairs fall within the contract contingency; they reported that the contract’s $30,000 allowance has been largely used and that additional repairs will require board approval.
Other project notes: a five‑year elevator inspection is scheduled; building siding work and additional generator maintenance contracts are being procured; and some site grading and drainage fixes at the recycle center are being scoped. Commissioners asked for a consolidated briefing and recommended convening project stakeholders (engineer, inspector, contractor, facilities and the county attorney) before authorizing larger expenditures.
Next steps: staff will set a meeting with the engineer and contractor, gather updated stamped prints and special‑inspection reports for the building official, obtain cost estimates for conduit repairs and any new pedestal or shed option, and return to the board with a recommendation.
