Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves Westwood Pines Commercial Park preliminary plat for seven lots near Highway 53
Summary
The council approved the preliminary plat for Westwood Pines Commercial Park, a proposed seven‑lot, roughly 10‑acre commercial subdivision at Cloverdale and Highway 53. Staff and planning commissioners discussed access, traffic and the stages at which the city can require impact studies and conditions.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Rathdrum City Council on Aug. 27 approved the preliminary plat for Westwood Pines Commercial Park, a proposed seven‑lot commercial subdivision on roughly 10 acres at Cloverdale and State Highway 53.
Planning staff explained the property has been zoned C‑2 (commercial) since annexation in 2011 and that the preliminary plat met code requirements for lot sizes and zoning. A staff presentation described average lot sizes of about 1.02 acres and lot ranges from about 0.56 to 2.4 acres.
Council and staff spent substantial time discussing where in the entitlement process the city can require traffic studies or other impact analyses. Planning staff and the city engineer explained that some conditions are most appropriately identified and imposed at the preliminary‑plat stage, while others are identified during annexation or rezoning — and that plats trigger time limits that move a proposal from concept toward development.
Several councilmembers expressed concern about additional traffic on Cloverdale and access to Highway 53. Staff noted the Idaho Transportation Department denied direct commercial access to Highway 53 at the flagged parcel edge and suggested future site traffic may be directed to the existing signal at Meyer and 53. Staff reiterated they lacked authority to add state highway signals; state approvals determine highway access.
Councilmember Merrill moved to approve the preliminary plat; the motion was seconded and passed on a roll call vote recorded in the meeting record.
Planning staff reminded the council that preliminary‑plat approval does not remove the council’s ability to require specific impact studies or conditions at later steps if future submissions (final plat or site plans) demonstrate unmet criteria.

