Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking And Rights Of Way topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reopens discussion, approves parking agreement at 8241 North Shore Trail
Summary
After reopening a previously defeated motion, the Forest Lake City Council approved an agreement with the adjacent property owner at 8241 North Shore Trail to install parallel parking at the owner's expense; the council approved the motion in a roll-call vote, 3–2.
The Forest Lake City Council reopened discussion on parallel parking at 8241 North Shore Trail and approved an agreement with the adjacent property owner to install parallel parking at that location. The council recorded a roll-call vote on the final motion: Council Member Erickson — Aye; Council Member Larson — No; Council Member Miller — No; Council Member Valento — Aye; Mayor Roberts — Aye. The motion carried, 3–2.
Council members debated whether approving the parking would reward property owners who had placed material and used the public right-of-way without prior city permission. One council member said allowing the improvement after the owner placed aggregate in the right-of-way would appear to “reward bad behavior”; another argued the parking addresses an existing need and that the city has allowed parallel parking in other busier corridors. The city attorney noted there was new information since the prior vote: the city does not currently have an ordinance prohibiting parking on North Shore Trail, and without an ordinance the posted “no parking” signs are not enforceable by police; that fact could justify reconsideration of the prior vote.
Staff reported the adjacent property owner has executed the proposed agreement and indicated a willingness to pay for the improvement; council retained the agreement language that allows the owner to seek Economic Development Authority (EDA) support. The council discussed possible alternatives such as limiting spots to employees, restoring “no parking” signage more broadly, and conducting a larger discussion about parking policy along the lake road.
The approved motion directed staff to proceed with the agreement as written (including the possibility of EDA assistance) and to return to the council with any required implementing documents and signage or ordinance language if council later decides to adopt an enforceable prohibition. Staff noted the potential for spillover parking if the council instead restores a broad no-parking designation for the corridor and said a separate workshop on the wider North Shore Trail parking policy would be appropriate.
The meeting transcript shows the council reopened the topic via a prevailing-member motion to reconsider and then voted on a motion to enter the agreement with the owner of 8241 North Shore Trail; the recorded roll-call vote followed the motion.
