Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Area Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Depew ZBA grants variance for porch/deck at 33 Mona Court on papers

5783552 · September 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Depew Zoning Board of Appeals voted 5–0 to grant an area variance allowing an attached porch/deck at 33 Mona Court after considering the applicant's written responses; the applicant was not present.

At its Sept. 11, 2025 meeting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Depew voted 5–0 to grant an area variance allowing a porch/deck to be attached on the north side of 33 Mona Court within the minimum front-yard setback.

The application notice listed Frank Barone as the applicant for 33 Mona Court. No one appeared at the hearing to speak on that application; the board proceeded on the written record after staff and legal counsel outlined options for the board to either act on the papers, adjourn the hearing or deny the application.

Before voting the board read the applicant’s written answers to New York’s area-variance criteria into the record. The application stated the proposed addition would not change the character of the neighborhood or create detriment to nearby properties; the applicant indicated the benefit sought could not be achieved without major expense such as adding a basement or garage. The application identified the minimum variance necessary as 4 feet.

Member Yarborough moved to grant the variance; Member Galvin seconded. Roll call votes recorded Overholt — yes; Galvin — yes; Menard — yes; Yarborough — yes; Chairman Delaney — yes. The motion carried, 5–0. The board closed the hearing and recorded no conditions attached to the approval.

Legal staff advised the board it could adjourn if members had unresolved questions about the application; members said they had no further questions and chose to decide on the papers. The board did not record additional findings beyond what the applicant supplied in writing.