Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council continues two agenda items and approves settlement with Sparkman Land LLC
Summary
The Jenks City Council voted to continue a surplus‑property consent item and to continue final approval of a PUD ordinance; it also approved Resolution 882, a settlement agreement with Sparkman Land LLC, during the meeting's reconvened session.
The Jenks City Council voted on three recorded actions during its meeting: the council continued (deferred) a consent agenda item declaring surplus property, continued final consideration of a planned unit development ordinance, and approved Resolution 882, a settlement agreement with Sparkman Land LLC.
On the consent agenda the council first approved the consent slate with Item E pulled for separate consideration. A motion was made to continue Item E so staff could obtain additional information, including planned usage by the school system and hydrology concerns related to existing ponds and potential flooding. The motion to continue Item E carried with recorded votes of "Yes" from Short, Boucher, Abel, Murray and Vice Mayor Brown.
Council likewise moved to continue Ordinance 61672 (final approval of JZ‑23 PUD‑137), with a motion and second to continue the item to the next meeting. The motion passed with recorded votes of "Yes" from Short, OJ, Abel, Murray and Vice Mayor Brown.
After reconvening from executive session, the council considered Resolution 882, described in the agenda as a settlement agreement with Sparkman Land LLC. A motion to approve Resolution 882 carried; the transcript records affirmative votes from Short, a name rendered as "Auger" in the audio, Abel, Murray and Vice Mayor Brown.
No roll call totals for abstentions or no votes were recorded in the transcript for these items. The council stated no votes were taken during the executive session. The motions and recorded yes votes are captured as they appear in the meeting record; specifics of the settlement agreement were not read into the public meeting record in the transcript provided.
The council also announced a scheduling change: the regular October 7 meeting was to be canceled and a special meeting rescheduled for September 30; the city clerk will circulate a notice.
