Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Service Area Release topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee defers decision on release of 299 McCrory Place from South Wilson service area
Summary
The committee heard a request from Cellcat Title Holdings to be released from the South Wilson Sewer Access service area for a proposed school use at 299 McCrory Place, asked staff and counsel to research conditions tying service rights to land, and deferred a decision to the next meeting in roughly 30 days.
Jamie Gillespie, civil engineer for the applicant, asked the Sanitary Sewer Access Committee to release a 299 McCrory Place parcel from the South Wilson service area so the owner could negotiate service with the Wilson Water and Wastewater Authority. Gillespie said the proposed use is a small dormitory-style school with 32 beds and an estimated 1,750 gallons per day (about five SFUs).
Staff described why the request is unusual: committee bylaws interpret service-area rights to attach to property regardless of zoning, and selling SFUs to a parcel can create a permanent allocation that remains with the land if future owners seek residential or commercial uses. Christopher told the committee that issuing SFUs for a currently approved school use could prevent the county from reclaiming capacity if the property later converts to residential or is subdivided.
Applicant detail: Gillespie said the project would not prepare food on-site (meals would be catered) and that soil studies indicate a feasible drip irrigation disposal system. He and staff agreed that the tract is large (about 40 acres) and that one option could be to limit the released acreage or tie the release specifically to the school use as approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals.
Committee action: after discussion about options and the need to consult the water authority and water authority counsel, a motion to defer consideration and return with additional research at the next meeting (within 30 days) was made, seconded and approved by voice vote.
What the record shows: staff requested time to discuss possible limiting language with the water authority attorney and county finance/engineering staff, and asked the applicant to clarify the minimum acreage needed for the proposed drip system and whether a narrower parcel tie would be acceptable.
Next steps: staff and the applicant will provide additional information and proposed limiting language for committee consideration at the next meeting.
