Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kanarraville planning panel sends updated annexation map and $250 filing fee to town board

5555602 · August 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Kanarraville Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 7 voted to forward a revised annexation policy and a preliminary annexation map to the town board and to charge a $250 fee for the start of an annexation petition.

The Kanarraville Planning and Zoning Commission on Aug. 7 voted to forward a revised annexation policy and a preliminary annexation map to the town board and to charge a $250 fee for the start of an annexation petition.

The commission’s staff member, Heidi, told the panel the map as drafted would include only two properties for consideration — owners she identified as Mary (Billings/Crace) and Shelby — because both are partially inside town boundaries and have town water meters. "If you are partially in the county and partially in the town and you have a town water meter, those are the ones that would be considered," Heidi said.

The move is intended to address a county and state concern about parcels that are partly inside and partly outside Kanarraville limits. Heidi said Iron County and recent changes in Utah code prompted the update and that the town’s previous annexation policy no longer complies with state law. She recommended the commission forward the draft map and accompanying paperwork to the town board for further action and public hearings in September.

Commissioners discussed narrower criteria for inclusion on the map (meter plus split parcel) rather than immediately drawing in other partially in/part-out lots. Several residents described property-line complications and past unilateral boundary changes by a former official that had affected tax and fire-district status. One resident said a prior change had removed part of his property from town and altered his insurance and fire coverage.

On fees, staff described the typical costs involved — professional survey, recorder fees in Iron County and staff time — and recommended a fee to cover town costs rather than to penalize applicants. After discussion, a commissioner moved to charge a $250 base filing fee for petition initiation (with higher fees to be considered for larger parcels); the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote.

The commission limited the draft annexation map to the two properties now identified; Heidi said additional properties could be added later but recommended waiting until the general plan and culinary water master plan are revised to understand service and infrastructure impacts. She told commissioners that some board members favored a slow, case-by-case approach so the town could plan for additional services such as water storage and hydrants rather than annexing broadly at once.

The commission approved forwarding the annexation packet and map to the town board for further review and public hearings. If the town board approves, the commission will hold a public hearing in September and then finalize the policy after the statutorily required steps and any county responses.

Votes at the meeting included approval of the July 2, 2025, planning and zoning minutes (voice vote) and the ultimately unanimous voice votes to forward the annexation draft to the town board and to set the $250 base filing fee. The commission adjourned at the end of the meeting.