Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fire Cip Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fire chief seeks new tanker and pumper; commissioners debate phased CIP funding

5529956 · August 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Fire representative Gary Burgess requested a replacement pickup and a 2,000-gallon tanker pumper, and commissioners debated whether to fund the requests through a phased capital-improvement plan or a larger one-time levy increase.

Mister Gary Burgess returned to the commission to present a capital-improvement request for the county’s rural fire service and seek a funding path for aging trucks and equipment.

Burgess outlined a $285,000 immediate request to replace a 1991 pickup with a 4-wheel-drive replacement and to obtain a 2,000-gallon tanker pumper to augment coverage in the east part of Geary County. He told commissioners: “Both of these are necessary for us to keep the little fire department work going. I don't wanna go backwards.”

Commissioners pressed for a capital-improvement plan (CIP) rather than a single-year request. One commissioner recommended building a reserve and proposed a spreading mechanism discussed in the meeting as "$1.75 a year" (the transcript uses that figure without specifying the unit of levy or tax base). Tammy said a steady contribution would allow the fire district to obtain the four items on Burgess’s list within two years if the board committed to a recurring funding level: “If we do 1.75 this year and 1.75 next year, he’ll get all 4 of those things.”

Other commissioners pushed for a formal CIP schedule and cautioned against approving a large one‑time levy spike. Several members stressed the need to protect taxpayers from large year-to-year swings and recommended placing money into a dedicated fund for fire capital so proceeds from vehicle sales or insurance recoveries would be preserved for replacement.

Burgess and multiple commissioners discussed alternative approaches: buy used apparatus after independent inspection, seek grants for self-contained-breathing-apparatus replacements (air packs), and create a rolling replacement schedule so not all equipment needs replacement in the same year. Commissioners debated trade-offs between immediate procurement and multi-year planning; one commissioner said she would not vote for a “wish list” without a funding plan, while others supported a phased levy increase to start the reserve.

No formal roll-call vote was taken; commissioners agreed to revisit the fire CIP at the next meeting and staff were asked to prepare a plan and pricing options. Burgess was told that, with a committed multi-year funding approach, he could obtain one or more vehicles during 2026–27 depending on timing and procurement lead times.