Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Administration Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Linn County approves towing‑policy revision, hires seasonal mower; routine claims and minutes approved
Summary
At its Aug. 4 meeting the Linn County Commission approved a revision to the county towing policy (Resolution 25‑20), hired a seasonal mower pending preemployment checks, and approved routine minutes and claims. A request for longevity pay for two departing employees was tabled until the next meeting.
Get email alerts on the County Administration Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Linn County commissioners on Aug. 4 approved several routine and administrative items, including a revision to the county towing policy, a conditional hire for a seasonal mower and routine financial actions.
The commission unanimously approved Resolution 25‑20, a revision to the county towing policy (policy letter 2018‑02); the chair was authorized to sign the revised policy. Commissioners also approved a motion to hire Tyson Freeman as a seasonal mower at the pay scale listed as 3D ($13.1238 per hour) pending preemployment checks, including a drug test and physical. The motion was moved, seconded and approved with an oral “aye” vote.
Other routine actions approved without roll‑call tallies in the record included approval of the previous meeting’s minutes, approval of claims totaling $112,778.79 and approval of ad/abatement items that included a refund of $29.26. Commissioners also approved the meeting agenda with an edit to add longevity requests to the agenda.
A request by the register of deeds and the treasurer for longevity pay deviating from handbook policy was discussed; commissioners agreed to table that request until the next meeting to allow all commissioners to be present and to gather more information. The sheriff’s and AMR reports were received for the record; public works provided updates on culvert purchases, landfill vertical‑expansion preparation and road projects.
Votes recorded in the meeting were by voice; the transcript records motions, seconds and unanimous “aye” approvals for the items above but does not record individual roll‑call votes.

