Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Downtown Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff reviews differences between 2006 and 2023 downtown master plans; council kept controls for property owners
Summary
Town staff summarized differences between the 2006 and 2023 downtown plans, noting three new districts, lower building height limits, protections for churches and the VFW, and zoning tools intended to give the council review of larger residential projects.
Town staff presented a comparison of the 2006 downtown master plan and the updated 2023 downtown plan, highlighting changes to districting, building heights and the town’s approach to zoning that were designed to give elected officials and property owners clearer rules for future development.
The 2023 plan, staff said, divides the downtown into three districts — a downtown core, downtown transitional, and a downtown transitional residential district — rather than the broader set of categories in the 2006 plan. Staff told the council the newer plan reduced the by‑right maximum building height from 75 feet to 50 feet and added safeguards intended to limit unexpected tax impacts on existing single‑family owners by creating the third district.
Staff noted that upper‑floor residential over ground‑floor commercial remains allowed, and that apartments above a small threshold would require conditional zoning (the town’s version of a special use permit) so the council can place conditions on larger residential projects. Churches, the VFW and other valued existing uses were written into the plan to avoid forced changes if those buildings are damaged or vacant, staff said. The presentation reiterated that the plan is a 20‑year vision and that actual development will depend on property owners, the council and the wider economy.
Why it matters: the 2023 plan provides an updated zoning and regulatory framework intended to steer future redevelopment of the downtown core while preserving some protections for existing owners. Council members asked staff to clarify how a property owner would pursue a rezoning or district change; staff advised owners to contact planning staff and noted contiguous parcels generally make rezoning requests simpler.
Next steps: no vote was required for the presentation. Staff said the plan and supporting UDO provisions were in place to guide future development applications and that the council could request more granular parcel‑level analysis if it wished.
