Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corner Lot Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends refinements to corner-lot ordinance language and graphics
Summary
The commission voted to recommend changes to a proposed ordinance clarifying technical and practical front-yard definitions on corner lots, including replacing the term "main building" with "principal structure," restoring a nearest-point measurement, and moving illustrative figures near the text.
The Huntington Woods Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Commission adopt revised corner-lot provisions that clarify which side of a corner lot is treated as the front yard and that incorporate clearer graphics and language changes.
During a public hearing and discussion of the ordinance draft, staff and the city attorney (Matt Zaleski) said the proposed changes are intended to ease zoning regulations for corner lots with double frontages so property owners do not need variances in routine situations. Commissioners asked for clearer placement of the four illustrative diagrams so readers can see figures alongside the associated text rather than flipping pages. The commission also sought plain-language clarifications: commissioners asked the draft to state that the "platted front" is synonymous with the "short side" of the lot; to restore language measuring the front yard to the "nearest point of the principal structure" (previously described as the "main building"); and to replace several instances of the word "and" with the word "to" in two related subsections to improve readability.
City Attorney Matt Zaleski and staff agreed the requested edits were straightforward. Commissioners also asked that the term "main building" be replaced throughout the ordinance with "principal structure" and that related references be updated consistently. Staff said those changes would be made in the rewrite before the ordinance goes to the City Commission.
A motion to recommend the ordinance to the City Commission with the edits described above passed by voice vote (ayes). The commission and staff said they would prepare a redrafted, clean version incorporating the agreed changes before the item is scheduled for the City Commission.
The recommendation does not itself change the municipal code; it is a referral to the City Commission with specific edits requested by the Planning Commission.
