Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Homestead topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Douglas County Board of Equalization restores multiple homestead exemptions, upholds one denial
Summary
At its Aug. 26 meeting the Douglas County Board of Equalization reviewed protests on homestead exemption denials and approved requests for most applicants while upholding one denial; all approvals are subject to final review by the Nebraska Department of Revenue.
Get email alerts on the Property Tax Homestead topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Douglas County Board of Equalization on Tuesday reviewed protests to homestead-exemption denials and voted to grant most applicants’ requests while upholding one rejection.
The board, acting in its equalization capacity, took individual votes on items c through k — homestead applications that had been denied or rejected by county staff for incomplete paperwork, late filing or failure to meet statutory eligibility. The board approved exemptions for the majority of the contested applications and upheld the denial where the applicant had moved to a nursing home and did not meet the residency requirement. All approvals will be forwarded to the Nebraska Department of Revenue, which the clerk said has the final authority to confirm homestead status.
Why this matters: homestead exemptions reduce property tax liability for eligible homeowners (older adults, veterans or disabled persons). County staff told the board the 2025 application cycle included more than 15,400 homestead applications — roughly 15% higher than two years earlier — creating time pressures and a narrow window for late filings.
Most contested cases involved missing documentation received only after staff issued denials. Douglas County Assessor’s Office staff explained the statutory disability standard for homestead relief is narrowly written and differs from Social Security disability rules. The assessor’s office described required deadlines (applications filed Feb. 1–June 30, a limited late window to July 20, and submission of income information to the Department of Revenue by August) and asked the board to act on protests where applicants subsequently supplied material that had been missing at processing.
Notable cases and board action
- Item C (Lori Obradovich): The board voted to grant the homestead exemption after Obradovich, who said she uses multiple medical braces and provided additional medical and historical documentation, asked the board to consider new material submitted with her protest. Motion by Commissioner Borgeson, second by Commissioner Friend; motion passed 6–0. County staff and the clerk noted the medical certification form submitted with the original application indicated the health care provider had determined she did not meet the county’s disability standard; the board accepted the applicant’s supplemental documentation and forwarded approval to the Department of Revenue for final determination.
- Item D (Mr. Yellinek): The board upheld the denial. Staff said Yellinek moved into a nursing home in October 2024, did not occupy the property between Jan. 1 and Aug. 15 as required by the homestead statutes, and had expressed no intent to return. Motion to uphold the rejection passed 6–0.
- Item E (Mr. DeGosta): Staff reported DeGosta supplied a post-denial letter from a Methodist Health System physician describing health conditions, but the assessor’s office said those notes did not directly reference the statutory disability elements tied to locomotion or loss of use of arms. Commissioners noted a lung-function reading cited by the physician and voted to approve the exemption; motion passed 6–0.
- Items F (Miss Meyer), G (Miss Morrissey), H (Mr. Zimmerman), I (LaWanda Valentine), J (Mr. Miadowski) and K (applicant signed by power of attorney): In each case, staff confirmed required documents (trust documents, income statements or deeds of reconveyance) had been provided as part of the protest after the county’s processing deadline. Commissioners voted to approve each exemption and to forward approvals to the Department of Revenue; all motions passed 6–0.
Public comment: An attendee, Larry Storer, criticized the process as burdensome for taxpayers and urged the board to provide more administrative help to residents; commissioners and staff reiterated that the annual recertification and required medical certifications are statutorily mandated and would require legislative change to alter.
Procedural note: The Board of Equalization’s approvals are recommendations forwarded to the Nebraska Department of Revenue for the Department’s final review and confirmation. Applicants will receive mailed notices explaining the county action and the Department of Revenue’s role in final determinations.
What’s next: The board set a hearing date of Sept. 9, 2025, for certified assessment corrections reflecting omitted or increased property values, and closed the equalization portion of the meeting after resolutions l–r were approved in block (with one agenda entry removed from the packet).

