Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hayden holds joint workshop on comprehensive plan; council and planners debate how to protect rural land

5597121 · August 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Hayden City held a joint City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission workshop to draft a new future land use map and reconcile high-level goals with zoning options, focusing discussion on how to preserve rural and agricultural areas and whether to create a light-industrial buffer near the airport.

Hayden City on Wednesday held a joint City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission special workshop focused on drafting a new future land use map as part of a comprehensive plan update. Donna, the planning staff member leading the session, reviewed five primary land-use categories and two overlay districts and asked council and commissioners to mark the city map with preferred future uses.

The session was presented as an exercise: staff gave participants printed maps and asked them to pick five colors to represent residential, public recreation, mixed commercial, light industrial and general commercial. Donna said the maps and related plans — including a central business overlay, a critical natural areas map, water district and school district service-area maps — “are components of the comprehensive plan” and are generally kept in the plan’s appendix. “The future land use map is driven from the plans, goals, and policies,” she said.

Why it matters: the workshop is intended to align the high-level future land use map with the council’s goals and policies before staff prepares formal plan text and zone-code amendments. Council members repeatedly pressed staff for clarity about how the high-level map would affect zoning and property owners, and whether the map would protect existing agricultural or rural uses from near-term development.

What staff presented and how the map works Donna described the map as intentionally imprecise, noting boundary lines are “kind of a swath and a fuzzy zone” and said those lines are generally within “300 feet plus or minus” of a delineated land use. She emphasized that the future land use map is a guiding tool; it does not itself change zoning. She listed the five primary land uses staff proposed and summarized two overlays: a Central Business District intended for pedestrian-friendly, mixed uses along Government Way, and a neighborhood commercial overlay for small, neighborhood-serving businesses.

Transportation corridors and higher-density housing Staff identified Prairie Avenue, Hayden Avenue, Lancaster, Highway 95 and Government Way as the city’s primary transportation corridors. Donna pointed to policy language encouraging higher-density housing “along primary transportation corridors where development doesn’t interfere with established neighborhoods.” Council members pressed staff on why Ramsey Road was not included; Donna said Ramsey is a predominantly built environment with established neighborhoods and so was not listed as a primary corridor for new higher-density housing.

Debate over agriculture, rural designations and long-term protections A substantial portion of the workshop focused on whether and how the draft future land use map should show agricultural or rural land as distinct from residential. Council member DuPreece and others said survey respondents had asked the city to preserve rural and agricultural open space and asked staff to include a designation for agricultural or rural lands. Donna replied that the draft land use chapter already identifies agricultural uses, but that designating land as agricultural on the future land use map could reduce incentives for property owners to annex into the city because agricultural uses can often be continued without urban services.

Council members asked how the city would preserve larger-lot or rural living options. Donna and other participants discussed using the future land use map as a high-level umbrella (a “30,000-foot view”) while creating new zoning categories at the next step to define minimum lot sizes (examples discussed included 1-, 2-, and 5-acre minima). Council member DuPreece said he would like to see areas identified for larger lots so they are less likely to be converted into higher-density subdivisions, and emphasized that zoning and standards of approval in the municipal code would ultimately govern outcomes.

Airport protection zones and light-industrial buffer Council and staff also discussed land near the Hayden airport and runway protection zones. Several participants proposed concentrating light-industrial or commercial uses around the airport to create a buffer between flight operations and housing. Donna and other participants noted runway protection areas and existing easements already influence what the city will allow near the airport; one participant said past approvals require recorded easements tied to odor, noise or safety considerations. The group marked portions around the airport as light industrial on the working map to reduce future pressure for housing immediately adjacent to runway corridors.

Parks and open space Council raised goal language requiring development to “consider and implement adequate parks and leisure space.” Staff said Hayden’s parks master plan, impact-fee framework and other code provisions would be the place to implement specific park requirements, and acknowledged some internal discussion about whether to add stronger ordinance language to guarantee onsite park construction by developers in every case.

Next steps and timeline Donna said staff will synthesize the workshop’s map and comments, convert them into a revised future land use map and bring the draft comprehensive plan language back for additional review. She and other staff indicated the intent to move toward a public hearing on comp-plan amendments in September and then to dovetail zoning-code amendments to implement the map’s finer-grain controls.

Procedural note At the end of the meeting a member moved to adjourn and the motion was seconded; no detailed roll-call vote was recorded in the transcript.

What remains unresolved Council members repeatedly asked for clearer links between the high-level map and the soon-to-be-drafted zoning categories (lot-size minima, annexation rules and standards of approval). Multiple speakers voiced concern that without those zoning protections in place, developers or owners could rely on the future land use map to support denser development. Staff said the plan and code changes are sequential: a broad land use designation first, then the zoning and standards that implement that designation.

Participants and how quotes are attributed in this article are taken from meeting discussion and staff presentation at the joint workshop on the comprehensive plan and future land use map.