Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Traffic Operations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public Works committee forwards traffic-control and speed-limit proposals to full council

5587950 · August 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Aug. 14, 2025 meeting, the Indianapolis City Public Works Committee voted to send three intersection-control ordinances (Proposals 2-46, 2-47, 2-48) and seven speed-limit ordinances (Proposals 2-49 through 2-55) to the full City-County Council with a "do pass" recommendation.

On Aug. 14, 2025, the Indianapolis City Public Works Committee voted to send a group of intersection-control and speed-limit proposals to the full City-County Council with a do-pass recommendation.

Nathan Sheets, deputy director of engineering for the Department of Public Works, introduced the three intersection-control proposals — Proposal 2-46 (50th and Sixth/Hatterford Avenue, District 7), Proposal 2-47 (Lyndhurst Drive and Mooresville Road, District 21) and Proposal 2-48 (Acton Road and Southeastern Avenue, District 25) — and offered to answer questions. Chairwoman Kristen Jones moved to send those three items together to the full council with a do-pass recommendation; the motion was approved by voice vote.

The committee then considered seven speed-limit items (Proposals 2-49 through 2-55) proposing new 25 mph or 30 mph limits in multiple neighborhoods: Canterbury and Forest Hills (District 7); Buck Creek Village and Cedar Park subdivisions (District 22); Diamond Place subdivision (District 1); Boulevard Manor subdivision (District 3); Kessler Park neighborhood (District 11); and a stretch between State and Emerson Avenues along New York and Michigan Streets (District 13). Nathan Sheets noted a small digest error for Proposal 2-55 but said the ordinance text is correct. Councillor Nick Roberts moved to send Proposals 2-49 through 2-55 to the full council with a do-pass recommendation; that motion was seconded and passed by voice vote.

No roll-call votes or vote tallies were recorded in the committee minutes; both actions were advanced by voice vote. Committee members did not request additional public hearings on these items during the meeting.

The committee meeting record shows the proposals will next appear on the full City-County Council agenda for final consideration.