Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves conditional due diligence for citywide rooftop solar; transcript shows procurement name inconsistency
Summary
The School Building Committee voted to authorize due diligence on a citywide rooftop solar proposal that would include the new high school and PreK–8 site; the transcript contains inconsistent contractor names for the recommended firm.
The School Building Committee voted to move forward with due diligence on a citywide rooftop solar program that would include the new Central Falls High School and the planned PreK–8 dual-language school.
A committee member presented the procurement recommendation and said the district and city purchasing board had reviewed the proposals. The motion, as recorded in the transcript, was to “conditionally award” the next step of investigation to the selected proposer so the city could determine whether a rooftop solar program was feasible across city-owned buildings; speakers emphasized the motion authorized only further study and did not obligate the city to install systems.
Committee members voted in favor by voice vote; one committee member who seconded was recorded as Sarah. A committee member summarized the intent: "We are not committing ourselves to doing anything. We're committing ourselves to the next step of due diligence. And we reserve the right to do nothing."
The transcript contains inconsistent references to the proposer’s name: the consultant presentation identified a recommended firm as FolkSquared Partners, while the motion spoken on the record referred to "Oak Square Partners." The committee did not resolve that naming inconsistency in the meeting record. This article therefore reports that the committee approved conditional due diligence for the city’s selected rooftop solar proposer and notes the transcript naming inconsistency; the official procurement record and contract documents should be consulted for the contractor’s exact legal name.
Committee members indicated that district staff (Alberto and Mary, per the transcript) will "quarterback" the due diligence process and provide updates as more information becomes available. No procurement contract was executed at the meeting.
Votes at a glance: the committee also approved payment of outstanding invoices and a revolving fund reimbursement submission during the same meeting; see the actions section below for vote details and amounts.
