Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Roof Replacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bannock County commissioners accept bids for Road and Bridge building roof, send them for legal review
Summary
The Bannock County Board of Commissioners opened five bids for a roof replacement at the county Road and Bridge building, accepted the submissions and voted to send them for legal review before awarding a contract.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Roof Replacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bannock County Board of Commissioners on an administrative motion accepted five bids submitted for a roof replacement at the county Road and Bridge building and voted to take the bids under advisement for legal review and compliance.
The bids were read into the record during the meeting and the county listed five respondents: All County Roofing (reported total $199,500), Contract West Roofing (reported $197,700), Thomas D. Robinson Roofing Inc. (reported $188,709), Upson Company (reported in the transcript as "217,000.05 8"), and Vision Investments LLC (reported twice in the record as $230,490 and $230,492). The transcript includes minor garbling in two line items; the county said contractors will be notified once a decision is made.
The board moved to "accept the bids as submitted and take them under advisement for legal review and compliance." The motion carried on a voice vote (recorded as "aye"), with no mover or seconder named in the transcript and no numeric roll-call provided.
A staff speaker told the board there is a bid opening scheduled for September 25 at 10 a.m.; the transcript indicated one addendum had been issued for the solicitation. Commissioners were asked to mark conflict-of-interest forms; the staff speaker said they had no conflicts to report. No award or contract was approved at the meeting; the discussion was limited to receiving bids and forwarding them for legal review.
All contractors who submitted bids were told they would receive notification after the county completes its review. The county did not provide a timeline for award, nor were department staff or a procurement schedule cited in the record.

