County staff outline plan to migrate PubWorks to G Works; commissioners ask for definitive pricing and implementation details

5808856 · September 22, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public works staff briefed commissioners on a proposed migration from PubWorks to G Works (web‑based), including real‑time mobile reporting, inventory integration and training; staff will verify exact pricing, proration and migration costs before the board decides.

Public works staff presented details about migrating the county’s asset and work‑order system from PubWorks to G Works, describing features staff said would reduce duplicate data entry, provide real‑time mobile updates, and consolidate inventory and fleet records.

Phil McGrath (PubWorks contact, via staff summary) described G Works capabilities including web access for citizens, mobile apps for crews that update in real time, a sign‑management module to inventory and track signs, and ready‑to‑run reports. Staff said G Works could eliminate the need to maintain a separate inventory system (Almida) and reduce manual Excel tracking.

Staff shared preliminary pricing and said there would be an implementation/ migration charge. Documents discussed at the meeting show an implementation bundle of approximately $8,000 and a year‑one price that staff recorded in a proposal as roughly $11,064 (with discounts and proration options under discussion). Staff also said the vendor offered training modules and a train‑the‑trainer session lasting about an hour; staff recommended including road foremen, supervisors, and maintenance leads in training.

Commissioners asked for a clear, itemized cost estimate, confirmation of whether migration fees would be prorated against the county’s current PubWorks contract, and a definite implementation schedule if the board elects to proceed. Staff agreed to confirm costs and pricing options and to post the vendor materials to SharePoint for commissioner review.

Ending: Commissioners did not vote on the migration; staff will follow up with prorated cost options and firm implementation timelines for a future decision.